Hi Kito,
I am all with you, and can certainly bring the result of this
discussion to the MyFaces team.
regards,
Martin
On 10/24/09, Kito Mann <kito.mann(a)virtua.com> wrote:
So far it's clear that the current way locales are handled in JSF
2 is not
intuitive and requires unnecessary overhead. Since we know this now, how
about defining a solution ASAP that can be handled a the implementation
level until 2.1 standardizes it at the spec level? This way we can save some
unnecessary pain for our developers, and avoid criticism of JSF 2 going
forward. Since everybody expects it to work like the current Java platform
prefixes, I don't think a new solution would require a lot of debate.
Thoughts?
---
Kito D. Mann | twitter: kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
Virtua, Inc. |
http://www.virtua.com | JSF/Java EE training and consulting
http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info | twitter:
jsfcentral
+1 203-404-4848 x3
JSF Summit Conference Dec 1st-4th in Orlando:
http://www.jsfsummit.com
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces