Thanks for your prompt response.
Comments inline.
>>>> On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 18:05:15 +0200, Matthias
Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> said:
MW> I think I don't get why the release() has been (re)moved at all and
MW> why this now need to exposed as lifecyle API.
MW> Doesn't the ticket talk about exception handling/reporting? I think I
MW> don't understand how that is related to release the facesCtx.
The reason it impacts exception handling is the case where an exception
is thrown as a result of action taken by the JSF impl to synchronize
session scoped beans at the end of a JSF request so that clustering
requirements are not violated. This is the catch block that needs to be
invoked when such an exception is thrown:
EB> + } catch (Throwable t) {
EB> + ExceptionQueuedEventContext eventContext =
EB> + new ExceptionQueuedEventContext(context, t);
EB> + context.getApplication().publishEvent(context,
EB> + ExceptionQueuedEvent.class, eventContext);
EB> + context.getExceptionHandler().handle();
EB> + } finally {
Obviously, this needs to happen *before* the FacesContext is released.
This proposal, provides a simple and clean way for the implemention to
know that the jsf portion of the request processing lifecycle has
finished.
Ed
--
| edward.burns(a)oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
| homepage: |
http://ridingthecrest.com/
| 7 work days until JavaOne 2010