Dan Allen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Ed Burns <Ed.Burns(a)sun.com
<mailto:Ed.Burns@sun.com>> wrote:
The class javax.faces.event.PostAddToViewNonPDLEvent should have been
removed before the spec went final. There are no usages of this class
anywhere in the RI, nor is it mentioned anywhere in the PDF document.
I am asking your permission to remove it from the API.
+1
+1
Speak now or forever hold your peace!
I'm thinking we should establish a voting policy when requests like
this go out to the mailinglist. When a simple ya/nay inquiry is put
forth, it needs let's say 4 EG votes to be considered accepted.
Obviously, that would not be sufficient for big things, but use your
best judgment on the classficiation. When 4 votes are received, just
send a follow up message to say "accepted."
Seems reasonable for these sorts of relatively uncontroversial issues.
Andy
Please correct my recommendation if you don't agree.
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Dan