October 2010 - jsr-314-open-mirror

Re: [jsr-314-open-mirror] [jsr-314-open] [490-XmlViews] Chapter 11: The JSF XML View Syntax

by Ed Burns

>>>>> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:23:33 +0700, Cay Horstmann <cay.horstmann(a)gmail.com> said: CH> As I had understood it, the need for XML was motivated by these usecases: CH> 1) To allow developers to use standard XML processing tools. In CH> particular, this requires to be truthful about the nature of the CH> documents (i.e. not claim that something is an XHTML file when it CH> isn't, but is really an artifact that will eventually be transformed CH> into XHTML) ...and the most important manifestation of that, in my opinion, is the requirement to have *all* elements prefixed. For example, a proper JSF XML Syntax View would look like this. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <weNeedSomeRootElement xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html"> <h:html> <h:head><h:title>Raw XML View</h:title></h:head> <h:body> <html:h2>XML declaration: consumed</html:h2> <html:h2>Processing instruction: consumed</html:h2> <?xml-stylesheet href="funky.xsl" type="text/xml" alternate="yes"?> <html:h2>CDATA section: consumed</html:h2> <![CDATA[ <p>This is CDATA</p> ]]> <html:h2>Comments: consumed</html:h2>  <h:form prependId="false" id="form"> <h:panelGrid id="grid" column="2"> <h:outputText id="text" value="hello" /> <h:commandButton id="button" value="reload" /> </h:panelGrid> <html:p>html template text</html:p> </h:form> </h:body> </h:html> </weNeedSomeRootElement> CH> 2) To not surprise developers with nonstandard XML processing (such as CH> processing comments). I'm not sure what you mean here. XML processing instructions are standard in XML. -- | edward.burns(a)oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017 | homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/ | 14 work days until German Oracle User's Group Conference

14 years, 2 months

4
4
0 / 0

Re: [jsr-314-open-mirror] [jsr-314-open] Fwd: Fix UIData state saving model

by Ed Burns

>>>>> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:32:21 -0500, Leonardo Uribe <lu4242(a)gmail.com> said: LU> The OCA was filled. I hope it will be no problem with share this LU> contribution with myfaces. I'm about ready to commit the feature to Mojarra head. I've added the test app and an HtmlUnit driver. Very nice test app. I just have to slap the standard copyright header on things before commiting. Ed -- | edward.burns(a)oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017 | homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/ | 7 work days until handoff of JSF 2.1 change log to jcp

14 years, 2 months

5
16
0 / 0

Re: [jsr-314-open-mirror] [jsr-314-open] JCP Maintenance Review for JSF 2.1 ends on 22 October

by Ed Burns

>>>>> On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:13:01 -0700, Alexander Smirnov <asmirnov(a)exadel.com> said: AS> Nick has attached patch for JSF spec. issues: AS> https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=658 AS> https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=678 I'm sorry to say, but neither of these issues has a patch attached to it. Are you certain a patch was attached? AS> Please take a look. How we can provide proposal for speck AS> documentation ? If the spec documentation that needs to be added or changed is in the javadocs/vdldocs/renderkitdocs, then they can be included in the diff because these artifacts are all generated from files in mojarra. If the spec documentation is in the PDF, then simple text files will suffice. Ed -- | edward.burns(a)oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017 | homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/ | 12 work days until German Oracle User's Group Conference

14 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jsr-314-open-mirror] [jsr-314-open] [777-FaceletCache] RESOLVED (was: [2.1 Spec Review] FaceletCache issues)

by Ed Burns

>>>>> On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:26:48 -0400, Andy Schwartz <andy.schwartz(a)oracle.com> said: AS> Some additional issues that turned up while reviewing the API doc: AS> 1. FaceletCache and FaceletCacheFactory are missing documentation. AS> The original (Mojarra implementation-specific) version of this AS> functionality does include documentation, but that doesn't seem to have AS> carried over into the public API. DONE. AS> 2. The doc in FaceletCache.MemberFactory is incorrect AS> The class doc says: "Factory interface for creating FaceletHandler AS> instances." However, we're actually creating Facelet instances, not AS> FaceletHandler instances. DONE. AS> 3. Wider access than necessary for some methods in FaceletCache AS> The original (Mojarra-specific) version of this functionality exposes AS> the following methods: AS> public final void init(InstanceFactory<V> faceletFactory, AS> InstanceFactory<V> metafaceletFactory) AS> protected final InstanceFactory<V> getFaceletInstanceFactory() AS> protected final InstanceFactory<V> getMetadataFaceletInstanceFactory() AS> The equivalent methods in the new public API are: AS> public void setMemberFactories(MemberFactory<V> faceletFactory, AS> MemberFactory<V> viewMetadataFaceletFactory) AS> public MemberFactory<V> getMemberFactory() AS> public MemberFactory<V> getMetadataMemberFactory() DONE. -- | edward.burns(a)oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017 | homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/ | 12 work days until German Oracle User's Group Conference

14 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jsr-314-open-mirror] [jsr-314-open] Sending message at 13:09 EDT

by Ed Burns

14 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jsr-314-open-mirror] [jsr-314-open] Forward from Ed Burns: Close of review period for JSF 2.1

by Roger Kitain

Originally sent on Sun, 24 Oct 2010 08:14:31 -0400 Hello experts, Thanks for all the excellent feedback! At this point, we can't accept any more new feedback for 2.1. Roger and I are continuing to digest your feedback and will be applying it to the spec. Our goal is to hand the final spec off to JCP on Thursday. We'll be putting out at least one more expert draft before that hand off. Sincerely, Ed Burns -- roger.kitain(a)oracle.com https://twitter.com/rogerk09 http://www.java.net/blogs/rogerk

14 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jsr-314-open-mirror] [jsr-314-open] [jsf 2.1 Spec Review] Section 14.4.3

by David Geary

Section 14.4.3 refers to what appears to be a non-existent method, FacesContext.isAjaxRequest(). david

14 years, 2 months

3
3
0 / 0

[jsr-314-open-mirror] [jsr-314-open] test

by Roger Kitain

test - please ignore -- roger.kitain(a)oracle.com https://twitter.com/rogerk09 http://www.java.net/blogs/rogerk

14 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jsr-314-open-mirror] [jsr-314-open] [2.1 Spec Review] ViewHandler.FACELETS_SUPPRESS_XML_DECLARATION

by Ed Burns

>>>>> On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:21:08 -0400, Andy Schwartz <andy.schwartz(a)oracle.com> said: AS> This constant is specified in the 20101013 version of the spec AS> (JavaDoc). I believe that we can remove this now as this functionality AS> is covered by the new Facelets processing mode. I do sympathize with your distaste for the redundancy this brings, but I submit this request is so common that such redundancy is warranted. Not everyone will want to go the hog and specify <facelets-processing>. Therefore, unless you or someone else feels strongly about it, I will leave this in. Ed -- | edward.burns(a)oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017 | homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/ | 12 work days until German Oracle User's Group Conference

14 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jsr-314-open-mirror] [jsr-314-open] spec snapshot

by Edward Burns

More to come, but here is one now. https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/files/documents/1936/153... Ed

14 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

jsr-314-open-mirror October 2010