Re: [jsr-314-open] [JSF 2.1 NEW] composite component namespace simplification
2009/12/9 Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
On 8 Dec 2009, at 17:55, David Geary wrote:
> And they have no idea why the have to specify such a long, ugly, and
difficult to remember prefix to the directory when all they want to do is
specify the directory.
Agreed, I don't think for the composite components we made the best choice
for URI schema, IMO it should have been more like
xmlns:pete="composite:components/pete"
I'd be happy with that. Perhaps we could add that as an alternative?
david
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 864 bytes)