Re: [jsr-314-open-mirror] [jsr-314-open] [901-DeprecateTargetConcept]
Yes, "implements" seems to be perfect for actionSource,
editableValueHolder an valueHolder.
However, for facet or clientBehavior "insert" still fits best.
Regards,
Jakob
2010/10/29 Ed Burns <edward.burns(a)oracle.com>:
>>>>> On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:00:06 -0400, Andy Schwartz
<andy.schwartz(a)oracle.com> said:
AS> On 10/29/10 3:32 PM, Ed Burns wrote:
>> If we're talking verbs here, I think an even better one is
"exposes".
>> The component implements the thing whether it's exposed or not.
AS> I can see two different notions of "implements":
AS> 1. The <h:commandButton> implements the ActionSource(2) contract.
AS> 2. The <h:commandButton> provides the implementation of the action
AS> source that is declared in the interface section of the composite component.
AS> I think that "implementsActionSource" works well for #2. I also like
AS> how this name leverages nomenclature/concepts that are already present
AS> in our composite component architecture. We have "interface" and
AS> "implementation" sections - "implementsActionSource" fits in
nicely with
AS> this model.
Ok, then I can get behind "implements".
Ed
--
| edward.burns(a)oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
| homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/
| 8 work days until German Oracle User's Group Conference
--
Jakob Korherr
blog: http://www.jakobk.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr
work: http://www.irian.at