Re: [jsr-314-open-mirror] [jsr-314-open] New anti-JSF blog entry: http://facemetal.wordpress.com/2010/07/19/jsf/
There is no way to partition the beans to the pieces that consume them. This causes two
problems for large applications:
1) The names need to be made longer for uniqueness
2) All of the bean information needs to be loaded at startup. This inefficiency is
extremely apparent during development.
-- Blake Sullivan
On Jul 21, 2010, at 7:56 AM, Ed Burns wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:31:32 +0200, Martin
Marinschek <mmarinschek(a)apache.org> said:
MM> The stuff which is still lacking from JSF, which he partially mentions:
MM> - back button support
MM> - double click handling
MM> - pretty URLs
MM> we should definitely address that at some point of time.
Thank you so much for your summary. The double click handling is being
covered by Roger as part of [559-SynchronizerToken].
MM> And: something he mentions I also think is not really good is the
MM> "global" managed bean scope. It would be good to have a way to let
MM> managed beans live only in a reduced, page (or conversation) visible
MM> scope.
Doesn't CDI give you this?
Ed
--
| edburns(a)oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
| homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/
| 18 work days until JSF 2.1 Milestone 2