Re: [jsr-314-open] Providing the ability to instantiate EzCompcomponents in Java code

I like it! Perhaps an annotation to specify the namespace? Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -----Original Message----- From: Norbert Truchsess <norbert.truchsess(a)t-online.de&gt; Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 23:27:18 To: <jsr-314-open(a)jcp.org&gt; Subject: Re: Providing the ability to instantiate EzComp components in Java code +1 from my side. I wander whether we even might go a step further and allow to optionally assign a 'real' UIComponent-class to an EzComp-Component (one that has JavaBean getter/setter methods instead of the untyped attribute-map only). Then one could do the following in java: MyFancyUIComponent comp = (MyFancyUIComponent)Application.createComponent("http://java.sun.com/...); comp.setMyAttribute(myAttributeTypedObject); .... Of course when just using the EzComp-component in xhtml the UIComponent being created by the Facelet would by of the same type. That would make EzComp-components look indistinguishable from a 'real' UIComponent in java ;-) - Norbert Am Freitag, den 31.07.2009, 11:20 -0400 schrieb Dan Allen: > This is a somewhat old request from Lincoln Baxter that I don't think > ever made it to the list. After reviewing the message, I too feel it > is worth discussing for JSF 2.1. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com&gt; > Date: Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 10:25 PM > Subject: Providing the ability to instantiate EzComp components in > Java code > To: jsr-314-comments(a)jcp.org > > I feel there is value in the ability to instantiate an EzComp object > in Java so that a component tree can be built in a backing bean (or > other Class). JSF must be doing this in the background through > Facelets, so providing this ability in Java should not be too > difficult. > > Referencing an object by its namespace should be sufficient: > > UIComponent comp = Application.createComponent(FacesContext, > "http://java.sun.com/jsf/composite/mynamespace:component"). > > Attributes would be assigned via the normal method: > > comp.getAttributes().put("rendered", false); > > This would greatly extend the reach of EzComp objects. > > Thanks, > Lincoln > > > PS... re-posted here on suggestion of Ryan Lubke