Re: [jsr-314-open] Inconsistency between Spec and XSD for include-view-params
On 4 Aug 2009, at 23:54, Dan Allen wrote:
NG> 2. it's really inconsistent and weird to have
dashes-in-the-name-
of-an-
NG> xml-attribute. For example, we use camelCase for actionListener:
Your points are well taken, but we did decide on this syntax.
NG> <h:commandButton actionListener="#{myBean.actionListener}" />
AFAIK you are comparing what appears in a JSF view definition with
what appears in faces-config.xml - it's standard in faces-config.xml
to use dashes, not camel case (in fact that is the convention in all
xml - it's JSF pages that aren't in line here).