Re: [jsr-314-open] [ADMIN] Final Draft Release Candidate 1

Hello Ed, I think you and Roger have done a wonderful job putting this all together, especially with all of the different artifacts. A few comments: PLD Docs * Since we've decided to call it the VDL, why are these still called PDLDocs? * The <composite:attribute> "method-signature" should probably be renamed "methodSignature" to be more consistent with the other attributes PDF Whole document -- "page description language" is still used in a few places -- a Search and Replace needs to be performed, and this will create some minor changes for the RI (for example, the configuration in 11.4.5) * Section 3.6.1.6, formatting is messed up * Section 5.6.1, p 5-15: "resource" is spelled incorrectly when describing getValue() * Section 5.6.2 doesn't mention "flash" as an implicit variable, and I don't see any other reference to how it is resolved in the PDF. The JavaDocs for Flash say its an implicit variable called "flash". In addition, I would expect "flash" to be "flashScope" like the other scope (even though it has special semantics). And why is flash a property of the ExternalContext instead of the FacesContext? * Section 13.1.1.1 -- As I've mentioned several times, it's silly for us not to have a simple @AjaxResource annotation that encapsulates the standard librarry name and its location. Every component developer is going to have to do this themselves. * Section 13.1.1.3 -- Same issue as 13.1.1.1 -- should be a <h:outputAjaxScript/> element * Section 13.1.1.3 -- Should say "The View Declaration Language Approach" --- Kito D. Mann -- Author, JavaServer Faces in Action http://twitter.com/kito99 http://twitter.com/jsfcentral http://www.virtua.com - JSF/Java EE consulting, training, and mentoring http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info +1 203-404-4848 x3 On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Ed Burns <Ed.Burns(a)sun.com&gt; wrote: