Re: [jsr-314-open-mirror] [jsr-314-open] [490-XmlViews] RESOLVED: Namespace and DOCTYPE
On 10/28/10 12:25 PM, Ed Burns wrote:
Here's what we will do for 2.1.
SECTION: DOCTYPE
* Add this row to Table 1-1 in Appendix A
<process-as>xhtml<process-as>xml<process-as>JSPX
XML Doctype passed through consumed consumed
* Add a doctype renderer to HTML_BASIC. Yes, I know doctype is not just
HTML and is in fact SGML, but I can't see putting it in f: because
nothing there actually has a real renderer (ClientBehaviorRenderers are
not real Renderers).
That's fine
The tag handler for this comes from Andy's suggestion.
<h:doctype rootElement="html" public="..." system="..."
/>
SECTION: Namespace
* If you want a namespace passed through to the client, pass it on
<html>, as suggested by Andy.
I think that they can set it on any element
that uses the default tag
handler. However, they shouldn't need to pass through the HTML
namespace anyway, since the XHTML ResponseWriter should be outputting
this for them if we are actually sending out XHTML.
AS> Of course, the following approach works just fine:
>> <f:view xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core"
>> xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html">
>> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
SECTION: ResponseWriter
AS> By the time we get to the ResponseWriter, we have less information
AS> available to us, and thus harder to correct arbitrary missing namespaces.
B> This is where the ResponseWriter is being hosed by the lack of apis for
B> the namespace. In theory, the default Facelets tag handler should
I do not want to pull ResponseWriter into this discussion now. That'll
have to wait.
We agree that the multi-namespace cases can wait. The XHTML
ResponseWriter can do the right thing anyway, so there shouldn't be any
basic cases where the namespace needs to be passed through.
-- Blake Sullivan
Ed