Re: [jsr-314-open] [jsf2next] might as well face it, Facelets is XML
Hi Dan,
I think he might have just been too lazy (or bored) to rip it out.
The
pass-through is a different argument from jsfc. I think jsfc is completely
and utterly useless. I see no value in it. I do see the value in the
pass-through for quick stuff. But even then, all that is being passed
through is the xml and doctype declaration, and the CDATA, all which happen
to be causing us issues with IE. (Remember, I'm not objecting to passing raw
HTML tags straight through, that is why Facelets is so successful. I'm
talking more about the document wrappers).
no, I don't think so. Tapestry is built completely around this idea,
so there is definitely people out there who think there is some value
in this - not that I personally think it makes sense if you start
using more sophisticated components. For the simple components, it has
some merits for a fairly large user-base (which is not the JSF
community).
That said, I would much rather have a nice IDE supported WYSIWYG
feature that works for all the component sets than this preview
support.
In any case, disabling this is not necessary for what you have in mind
- and I definitely support your suggestion. Just saying that we should
still leave the other option open as well, and we will need to do it
for backwards compatibility anyways.
regards,
Martin
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces