>>>> On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:12:59 -0500, Leonardo Uribe
<lu4242(a)gmail.com> said:
LU> The problem with allow it with a context-param is there is no way to
LU> "reset" the deltas or remove rows to synchronize the model with the
LU> component state.
LU> Suppose a simple use case, where there is a datatable and an option
LU> that removes one row. Since we don't have a way to notify the
LU> component that the row has been removed the state of the deleted row
LU> will be applied on the next one.
Ok, I see.
Now, when I discussed with the expert community at a recent meeting the
process for accepting new features for 2.1, I tried to be as clear as
possible that we'd need the contributing party to do *all* of the work.
Leorando, you've done the code, and it's great, but the spec language is
even more important since this body, technically, is partially
responsible for the spec. Oracle, as the sponsor, is solely responsible
for the impl. Now, as I said, I'm delighted with your contribution of
an implementation for this feature, but I need you to author as much as
possible of the spec text.
I've started by documenting the preserveRowComponentState property in
the UIData.setPreserveRowComponentState() method.
Please take a look at the javadoc I've generated in this attachment [1]
to issue 153 [2]. I've posed some questions in there, you can anwser
them here. Also, please correct my where I've gone wrong.
If you could submit a text file with sketches of the javadoc for other
elements of this feature, for example, the new TransientStateHelper
interface, it would really increase the likelihood of this feature
making it into 2.1.
[1]
https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachm...
[2]
https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=153
--
| edward.burns(a)oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
| homepage: |
http://ridingthecrest.com/
| 12 work days until JSF 2.1 Milestone 3