Re: [jsr-314-open] [jsf2.next] Proposal to support new semantic HTML5tags
I actually oppose the idea of creating a lot of different tags with no
significant difference except the name of the tag created.
It increases the conceptual weight of the API - more tags that do the
same thing is, I'd think, a bad thing.
Though this is mostly a moot point - there will be no HTML5 support in
any near-term version of JSF.
Jim
On 12/14/09 10:25 AM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
+1 to Simon, I prefer individual tags for claritys sake.
Lincoln Baxter III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
Keep it simple.
> On Dec 14, 2009 10:12 AM, "Simon Lessard" <Simon_Lessard(a)dmr.ca
> <mailto:Simon_Lessard@dmr.ca>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would highly prefer adding all tags in the h: namespace, else some
> pages might end up with just too many imbricated panelGroup to be
> easily readable. Furthermore the renderer will be more complex and
> there would be a, albeit small, performance overhaul as the attribute
> has to be evaluated. The only thing that won't be supported with tags
> is dynamic change of the layout, but semantically it makes no sense
> anyway. I think it would also be time to add <h:paragraph/>,<
> h:fieldSet/>, <h:legend/>, briefly every single valid HTML tags.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> ~ Simon
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: jsr-314-open-bounces(a)jcp.org
> <mailto:jsr-314-open-bounces@jcp.org> on behalf of Jim Driscoll
> Sent: Fri 12/11/2009 5:41 PM
> To: jsr-314-open(a)jcp.org <mailto:jsr-314-open@jcp.org>
> Subject: [jsr-314-open] [jsf2.next] Proposal to support new semantic
> HTML5tags
>
> HTML5 has a number of new semantically meaningful tags. See here for a
> painless introduction: ht...
>