Re: [jsr-314-open] <h:dataTable> binding vs. ui:repeat

LB> I already got mail by Kin-Man - he said this won't be included, we LB> are too late. DA> I don't get it. Why are JSR-299 and JSR-330 allowed to change so DA> drastically before Java EE 6, yet we need one small change in EL and DA> it can't happen. This is crap. If we all agree this change would be DA> valuable, I want to see it included. Whose arm do we have to twist? Think of it this way. There is a finite amount of change that Sun, as platform spec lead for Java EE 6 is willing to accept. JSR-299 and JSR-330 have consumed all of that finite amount! Perhaps if things were more stable on the 299 and 330 fronts we'd have room for these little changes. For now, we have no plans to produce another revision of JSF 2.0 before Java EE 6 goes final. Also, one must bear in mind the external economic and regulatory considerations that come into play when allocating resources in any corporate entity. Ed -- | ed.burns(a)sun.com | office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640 | homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/