+1. This mindset shift will help bring us up to speed with other XML based
frameworks, and help reduce the learning curve / qwerkiness of jsf in the
mid-long term.
Lincoln Baxter III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
Keep it simple.
On Dec 13, 2009 12:16 PM, "Dan Allen" <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 11:28 AM, David Geary <clarity.training(a)gmail.com>
wrote: > > 2009/12/13 Dan...
Yeah!
One thing to keep in mind with the default namespace is that if you want to
use HTML, you would have to prefix it in the case above (which might be
strange to some people):
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<component xmlns="jsf:cc"
xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<interface> <attribute name="name"
required="true"/>
</interface> <implementation>
Hello, <html:strong>#{cc.attr.name}</html:strong>
</implementation>
</component>
-Dan
p.s. Isn't it strange every time you see 1999/xhtml? ;)
-- Dan Allen Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #2...