On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Jim Driscoll <Jim.Driscoll(a)sun.com> wrote:
On 12/11/09 2:26 PM, Ed Burns wrote:
>
> My plan was to merge the branch back into HEAD and do the work there.
>
I don't think 2.0 is ready to be the side branch yet. There's still a lot
of work to do there.
Similarly, as Dan notes, some of the changes, like h:inputFile, may
possibly be disruptive.
I'll let Ryan chime in - as lead, I'd prefer it be his call.
This is also pending a decision about moving the VCS to some more modern
system like mercurial or git - both of which are supported on Kenai. But my
understanding is that we'd like to hear Oracle's plans before we commit one
way or the other, as well as some indication from GF on which direction
they're going as well (last I heard, it was mercurial on Kenai). We may
want to avoid any big juggling till we have that sorted, and that's liable
to be 2-3 months away.
All of that sounds good.
I just wonder if we could create a prototype branch on Kenai in the short
run that wouldn't affect any users of Mojarra and would let us play while we
wait. We could kill it as soon as we do any sort of official migration.
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen