.
What a mess!
At least it paves the way towards handling hierarchical library names in
the future, should you choose to do so.
On 02/03/2010 09:12 AM, Dan Allen wrote:
Cay, could you organize your comments into a spec issue?
Thx,
-Dan
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:18 AM, David Geary <clarity.training(a)gmail.com
<mailto:clarity.training@gmail.com>> wrote:
+1. This should definitely be fixed.
david
2010/2/3 Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com
<mailto:dan.j.allen@gmail.com>>
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Jason Lee
<jason(a)steeplesoft.com <mailto:jason@steeplesoft.com>> wrote:
On 2/1/10 9:13 AM, Kito Mann wrote:
> There was a discussion about nested resource library names
> last year. I would say to search the archives, but I don't
> know if that's possible. Anyway, here was the outcome:
>
> Ed:
>
> Yes, you are correct that the resource naming scheme
> prevents nested
> resource libraries. Nested resource libraries were not
> on the list of
> requirements when we designed this feature back in
> November of 2007. We
> will not accept this requirement change at this point.
>
>
> Dan:
>
> So the spec needs to at least be clear that it's not
> permitted and suggest the alternative. Several people
> reading it didn't understand what to do in this case.
>
> IMHO, it's a shame that we can't use the nested structure.
> Seems like a pretty obvious convention instead of
> configuration thing. I don't know how that got missed in
> the design process.
It would be interesting to find out why that was left out.
Was it simply an oversight, or are there technical reasons
for disallowing that? On the surface, it sounds like it
would be easy to implement and support, but I've not thought
too deeply on the topic. Maybe that's something we should
fix, if we can, for 2.1.
We never got to the bottom of why this was left out, but I think
there was a general agreement that it should be fixed. Let's
discuss when and get an issue report filed.
Here is the (not-so-pretty) link to the original discussion:
http://archives.java.sun.com/cgi-bin/wa?A1=ind0904&L=JSR-314-OPEN&...
<
http://archives.java.sun.com/cgi-bin/wa?A1=ind0904&L=JSR-314-OPEN&...
(that reminds me I have some leaning on the JCP PMO to get to).
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://mojavelinuxcom <
http://mojavelinux.com>
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
--
Cay S. Horstmann |