Re: [jsr-314-open] Method signatures for event handlers
On 01/22/2010 08:52 AM, Kito Mann wrote:
Personally, I don't think there's anything wrong with having
a signature
that requires an event listener. Isn't that how most UI toolkits work?
What about Swing or SWT?
I do understand the desire to have some code completely decoupled,
though. If we make the signature optional, though, I'm afraid that'll be
even more confusing for users.
I don't think it is confusing to say "This parameter is optional". Lots
of things are optional in JSF. The reason you want to make it so is to
have a better unit testing story.
Cay
--
Cay S. Horstmann | http://horstmann.com | mailto:cay@horstmann.com