Re: [jsr-314-open] [jsf2.next] <h:head> vs. <head>

Tuesday, 12 January 2010

Once again, I'm reviving an older thread. So glad to be able to post again! :-)

When running in a portlet environment, it is forbidden for a JSF portlet to render tags
like <head> and <body>. Tags like that are controlled by the portlet
container, when aggregating portlet fragments into a complete HTML document.

So I think it would be better to have the page author to explicitly specify h:head and
h:body. If they specify plain old <head> and <body> then the portlet container
will likely strip them out. Currently, we can override the renderers for h:head and h:body
in a portlet bridge in order to have them not render those tags.

Neil

On Dec 15, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:

...
 I'd even like to see it add <head> if not provided. Would
that be too overreaching?

 Lincoln Baxter III
 http://ocpsoft.com
 http://scrumshark.com
 Keep it simple.

> On Dec 15, 2009 1:02 PM, "David Geary" <clarity.training(a)gmail.com&gt;
wrote:
> 
> 2009/12/15 Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com&gt;
> > > It would be nice if it "just worked", and jsf would automatically
add/detect he right place to l...
> 
> +1. I always pitch h:head and h:body as necessary to coordinate with resource
relocation from h:outputScript and h:outputStylesheet, but it would be great if you could
just use <head> and <body> instead, and have everything work.
> 
> 
> david 
> > > Lincoln Baxter III > http://ocpsoft.com > http://scrumshark.com >
Keep it simple. >> >> On Dec 1...
> 
> 

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009