July 2012 - mod_cluster-issues - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (MODCLUSTER-317) windows mod_ssl.so broken

by Jean-Frederic Clere (JIRA)

11 years, 7 months

1
5
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (MODCLUSTER-140) Rpc failure can lead to failure to deploy a webapp

by Paul Ferraro (JIRA)

Rpc failure can lead to failure to deploy a webapp -------------------------------------------------- Key: MODCLUSTER-140 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/MODCLUSTER-140 Project: mod_cluster Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 1.1.0.CR1, 1.0.3.GA Reporter: Paul Ferraro Assignee: Paul Ferraro Fix For: 1.0.4.GA, 1.1.0.CR2 An exception thrown during an rpc call should never propagate to the web container. See stack trace in forum thread. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 8 months

2
3
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (MODCLUSTER-224) when using tomcat manager webapp to stop/start an application the start is ignored by mod_cluster

by Jean-Frederic Clere (JIRA)

when using tomcat manager webapp to stop/start an application the start is ignored by mod_cluster ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: MODCLUSTER-224 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/MODCLUSTER-224 Project: mod_cluster Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 1.1.1.Final, 1.0.9 Environment: tomcat and manager webapp + any test webapp. Reporter: Jean-Frederic Clere Assignee: Jean-Frederic Clere Fix For: 1.0.10, 1.1.2.Final See JBPAPP-6262 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 8 months

2
7
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (MODCLUSTER-288) SystemMemoryUsageLoadMetric is of no use to anyone

by Michal Babacek (JIRA)

Michal Babacek created MODCLUSTER-288: ----------------------------------------- Summary: SystemMemoryUsageLoadMetric is of no use to anyone Key: MODCLUSTER-288 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/MODCLUSTER-288 Project: mod_cluster Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 1.2.0.Final, 1.1.1.Final, 1.1.0.Final, 1.0.10 Reporter: Michal Babacek Assignee: Paul Ferraro I am convinced that the [SystemMemoryUsageLoadMetric.java|https://github.com/modcluster/mod_cluste...] is of no use to anyone. I have tested it by allocating some memory outside the JVM control with [NativeMemoryStress.c|https://github.com/Karm/clusterbench/blob/system-mem...]. The results from Mod_cluster are such that the system is almost fully loaded all the time despite the fact that I work with 8GB RAM box with almost nothing running on it. This [picture|http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/mod_cluster-QE/view/mod_cl...] displays time on X axis and (100-(Load from Mod_cluster)) on Y axis. As you may observe, all 4 nodes appear to be under full load all the time and there is a spike on each of them. This spike represents a period of time when the aforementioned [NativeMemoryStress.c|https://github.com/Karm/clusterbench/blob/system-mem...] was called with the following setting: {noformat} megabytes 500; milliseconds 60000; {noformat} What had happened is that kernel has cleared some cache and garbage data from the RAM in order to accommodate new demands, so by the time I freed the memory, there was all of sudden actually more free RAM then before. The actual problem with the current [SystemMemoryUsageLoadMetric.java|https://github.com/modcluster/mod_cluste...] implementation using [OperatingSystemMXBean|http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/jre/api/manage...] is that this code: {code:lang=java} +++ public static final String FREE_MEMORY = "FreePhysicalMemorySize"; public static final String TOTAL_MEMORY = "TotalPhysicalMemorySize"; +++ double free = ((Number) this.server.getAttribute(name, FREE_MEMORY)).doubleValue(); double total = ((Number) this.server.getAttribute(name, TOTAL_MEMORY)).doubleValue(); return (total - free) / total; +++ {code} Is somewhat similar to this (on 8GB RAM machine with almost nothing running on at the moment): {noformat} [karm@killerbox karm]$ free -m total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 7933 6755 1177 0 44 141 -/+ buffers/cache: 6569 1363 Swap: 16383 58 16325 {noformat} Obviously, this does not mean that I could get only 1177MB of RAM if I want to. The "free" actually means "wasted". The majority of RAM is being used as cache. If I ask for e.g. 2GB, I am gonna get them, because kernel will simply sacrifice some cache, clears some garbage from RAM and free up space so as to accommodate my demands. So, according to my opinion, on a sane, well-behaving caching operating system, the [SystemMemoryUsageLoadMetric.java|https://github.com/modcluster/mod_cluste...] will always show ~ 98% RAM usage. Due to this fact, this metric is unlikely to be of some use to anyone. What do you think? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 8 months

3
10
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (MODCLUSTER-322) Using AverageSystemLoadMetric can improperly cause a Load Factor of 0

by Aaron Ogburn (JIRA)

Aaron Ogburn created MODCLUSTER-322: --------------------------------------- Summary: Using AverageSystemLoadMetric can improperly cause a Load Factor of 0 Key: MODCLUSTER-322 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/MODCLUSTER-322 Project: mod_cluster Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 1.2.1.Final, MOD_CLUSTER_1_0_10_GA_CP02 Environment: *JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 5 *Apache httpd *mod_cluster 1.0.10.GA_CP02 or 1.2.1 Reporter: Aaron Ogburn Assignee: Jean-Frederic Clere Fix For: MOD_CLUSTER_1_0_10_GA_CP03 It looks like AverageSystemLoadMetric is not properly implemented. When using it, mod_cluster may always report a load factor of 0, thus making the JBoss node unreachable from Apache. We've tested with a simple web app that checks the underlying MXBean SystemLoadAverage: Double.class.cast(server.getAttribute(ObjectName.getInstance(ManagementFactory.OPERATING_SYSTEM_MXBEAN_NAME), "SystemLoadAverage")).doubleValue() This info is grabbed pretty much the same way mod_cluster does, but these calls appeared to work just fine outside of mod_cluster as it returns the following values from my test app: 12:08:26,519 INFO [STDOUT] From MBeanServer: 1.81640625 So the issue does not appear to be necessarily with the underlying JDK/MXBean call but with how mod_cluster is handling the data grabbed from it. But the root cause here appears to be that a value above 1 is being returned, and it looks like mod_cluster is expecting metrics to return a 0-1 percentile based range. The way the load is determined allows the AverageSystemLoadMetric to improperly exceed its weight. For example if it were weighted as 2 and another metric was weighted at 1 (say RequestCountLoadMetric with a capacity of 1000), then AverageSystemLoadMetric should only be able to account for 67% of the load. But here we can see AverageSystemLoadMetric can out run its weight and really account for 100% of the load. So let's say AverageSystemLoadMetric is the above seen 1.81640625 value with 100 requests/second, putting RequestCountLoadMetric at .1 load, so DynamicLoadBalanceFactorProvider would calculate the load factor like so: int load = (int) Math.round(100 * totalWeightedLoad / totalWeight); int load = (int) Math.round(100 * (1.81640625 * 2 + 0.1) / 3); load = 124.4 And that gets truncated down to 100 so AverageSystemLoadMetric comes to represent really all of the load. But if a 2 weight metric is at its max and a 1 weight metric is at .1%, then their total load should just be ~70-71%. S is mod_cluster assuming that the SystemLoadAverage will always be between 0 and 1? Does it look like mod_cluster is not properly scaling this metric? Do we know a definite max return to expect from OperatingSystemMXBean.getSystemLoadAverage() so that this metric can be scaled more in line with the other percentile based ones? Or should a user definable max capacity be implemented into this metric as it is with others? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 8 months

3
5
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (MODCLUSTER-313) Segmentation Faut when using httpd-2.2.15 with mod_cluster compile with 2.2.17.

by Jean-Frederic Clere (JIRA)

Jean-Frederic Clere created MODCLUSTER-313: ---------------------------------------------- Summary: Segmentation Faut when using httpd-2.2.15 with mod_cluster compile with 2.2.17. Key: MODCLUSTER-313 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/MODCLUSTER-313 Project: mod_cluster Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: MOD_CLUSTER_1_0_10_GA_CP02 Reporter: Jean-Frederic Clere Assignee: Jean-Frederic Clere Fix For: MOD_CLUSTER_1_0_10_GA_CP03 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 9 months

1
3
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (MODCLUSTER-91) Connector bind address of 0.0.0.0 propagated to proxy

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

Connector bind address of 0.0.0.0 propagated to proxy ----------------------------------------------------- Key: MODCLUSTER-91 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/MODCLUSTER-91 Project: mod_cluster Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 1.0.1.GA Reporter: Brian Stansberry Assignee: Jean-Frederic Clere Marek Goldmann wrote: > I'm encountered a strange error. When I bind JBoss instance to 0.0.0.0 > address instead of a fixed ethernet address, node gets registered in > mod_cluster, shows in mod_cluster-manager, but every request to > registered contexts throws 503 error. > > httpd error log: > > [Fri Aug 07 03:21:05 2009] [error] (111)Connection refused: proxy: > ajp: attempt to connect to 0.0.0.0:8009 (0.0.0.0) failed > [Fri Aug 07 03:21:05 2009] [error] ap_proxy_connect_backend disabling > worker for (0.0.0.0) > [Fri Aug 07 03:21:15 2009] [error] proxy: ajp: disabled connection for > (0.0.0.0) > [Fri Aug 07 03:21:25 2009] [error] proxy: ajp: disabled connection for > (0.0.0.0) > > This looks like a bug for me, because many administrators are binding > JBoss to 0.0.0.0. The java side needs to understand that 0.0.0.0 is useless as a client address and send something useful. Trick is deciding what's useful. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 9 months

4
12
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (MODCLUSTER-303) Discovery protocol based on mod-cluster

by Vladimir Blagojevic (JIRA)

Vladimir Blagojevic created MODCLUSTER-303: ---------------------------------------------- Summary: Discovery protocol based on mod-cluster Key: MODCLUSTER-303 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/MODCLUSTER-303 Project: mod_cluster Issue Type: Feature Request Reporter: Vladimir Blagojevic Assignee: Vladimir Blagojevic Fix For: 1.1.4.Final In it previous life used to be https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1322 It would be nice to have a discovery protocol that can use mod-cluster as the source of the node information. Mod-cluster already knows the list of participating nodes and provides this information in a well known format, so it could be simple to implement. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 9 months

3
3
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (MODCLUSTER-320) CLONE - Backport MODCLUSTER-168 to 1.0.10.GA - mod_cluster should use hostname provided in address instead a IP address

by Aaron Ogburn (JIRA)

11 years, 9 months

1
3
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

mod_cluster-issues July 2012