Re: [bv-dev] Renaming ExecutableDescriptor#areParametersConstrained()?
hasConstrainedParameters() is better that the current situation.
But then we also need to move to hasConstrainedReturnValue().
https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/BVAL-432
Rich, we could not find a use case for ExecutableDescriptor hosting
isExecutableConstrained() and the singular isParameterConstrained does
not work here as we are looking at the method aggregating all params
for a given executable.
Emmanuel
On Thu 2013-02-28 10:06, Matt Benson wrote:
My vote is for #hasConstrainedParameters().
Thanks,
Matt
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Rich Midwinter <rich.midwinter(a)gmail.com>wrote:
> Perhaps worth mentioning we have BeanDescriptor#isBeanConstrained() too in
> 1.0. So at first glance I'd probably suggest isParameterConstrained() and
> also isExecutableConstrained().
>
> Rich
>
>
> On Thursday, 28 February 2013, Gunnar Morling <gunnar(a)hibernate.org>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > Hardy and I were wondering whether the method
> name ExecutableDescriptor#areParametersConstrained() is the best choice.
> > The name seems a bit unintuitive, when e.g. looking via auto-completion
> for boolean getter methods which typically start with "is" or
"has". Maybe
> > * "isParameterConstrained()" (as in "is constrained on at least
one
> parameter") or
> > * "hasConstrainedParameters()" would be better alternatives?
> >
> > The latter would also nicely match with
> BeanDescriptor#hasConstrainedExecutables().
> > WDYT?
> > --Gunnar
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>
_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev