Re: [bv-dev] BVAL-238 Dependency injection in ConstraintViolation
On 24 oct. 2011, at 10:11, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>
> So generally I think the BV/CDI integration should be more
> triggered/managed from the CDI side than the other way around.
I am not a big CDI expert, but that sounds reasonable to me.
Which ever side is it, we need to think through how the user will achieve that (ie simple
or zero configuration rocks). Look at how we do it in JPA and JSF: no configuration by
default, it just works.