On 16 sept. 2011, at 15:22, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:15:10 +0200, Emmanuel Bernard
<emmanuel(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
>> +1 for having a wiki page. This might be useful for some collaborative
>> editing. Although for sharing code snippets using simple gists [1]
>> might be simpler. There is also a wiki functionality on github [2].
>>
>> Emmanuel/Hardy: Could you enable that for the beanvalidation repository?
>
> I am not against enabling the wiki but we have already several tools at
> our disposal and I wonder if adding a new will be beneficial or
> detrimental.
> I would like us to try to use the website as a pseudo-wiki. Granted, it
> is not as immediate as a wiki but this model might work. If this turns
> out to fail, we can fall back to GitHub's wiki.
So how would that work? We checkout the site and make changes locally and
create
pull requests?
Good point.
I think the pull request approach will not work very well.
One alternative is to give r/w access to whoever wants in this group if you promise me to
rebase as opposed to merge and keep commits focused and to the point :)
People interested in the experiment, give me your github login and I will add you to the
read write group.
Note: the website is usually updated within 2 mins of a push to GitHub.