Re: [bv-dev] Method validation - cont'd
On 14 mai 2012, at 20:24, Gunnar Morling wrote:
>> * Should ParameterNameProvider go into a sub-package?
> which one do you have in mind there?
Normally I'd lean towards to javax.validation.spi, since PNP is
something which is implemented by clients. But I think in BV 1.0, the
"spi" package is centered more around bootstrapping.
So personally I'd be fine with leaving PNP directly within javax.validation.
Emmanuel, I think you originally raised the idea of putting it into a
separate package. Do you have anything special in mind here?
I think I was wrong. I would love to get the class in a subpackage because I find
javax.validation quite crowded but
ParameterNameProvider is no different than MessageInterpolator or TraversableResolver.