Re: [bv-dev] Support for OptionalInt, OptionalLong and OptionalDouble
On 17 May 2017, at 15:33, Gunnar Morling <gunnar(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
> Should we be really brave and rename or alias that member to
value()?
I thought about it, but value() reads poorly if other members are
added down the road (I cannot think of any, though). But given that
@ExtractedValue is only used by BV providers and a very few authors of
custom extractors, I don't mind the few extra characters of type() for
the sake of more explicitness.
What do others think?
Even if type is the only attribute ever, I think it is much clearer than value. I'd
keep it as is.