Re: [bv-dev] Method validation - cont'd
On May 14, 2012, at 8:24 PM, Gunnar Morling wrote:
>> * Should ParameterNameProvider go into a sub-package?
> which one do you have in mind there?
Normally I'd lean towards to javax.validation.spi, since PNP is
something which is implemented by clients. But I think in BV 1.0, the
"spi" package is centered more around bootstrapping.
As you say, it depends on the definition of spi. I also think api in Bean Validation
is originally centered around bootstrapping. However, by just adding
ParameterNameProvider
into the package this would change without any negative side effects.
So personally I'd be fine with leaving PNP directly within
javax.validation.
I was thinking the same initially, but looking at the amount of classes in
javax.validation it is probably
a good idea to use a different package. I am not sure in which other existing or new
package it should go
except spi
--Hardy