Re: [bv-dev] Package javax.validation.spi
On Feb 25, 2012, at 14:15, Gunnar Morling <gunnar.morling(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
--hardy
Based on the contained classes I'm supposing that the BV spi
package
has a much more focused scope (bootstrapping). Then
ParameterNameProvider should go into javax.validation. Any thoughts?
I think you are right that the current API package is focused on bootstrapping. Unless the
whole spi structure would get changed (which we really cannot do), I think the best option
is javax.validation.
Btw. there isn't much package-level JavaDoc for the BV API in
general
(only for javax.validation.groups). I think we should add some more
for BV 1.1. WDYT?
+1 just create a pull request ;-)