What’s the difference between a field and a getter based property?
It is the same for all intended purposes in Bean Validation.
On 21 Nov 2016, at 15:51, Matt Benson <mbenson(a)apache.org>
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:18 AM, Gunnar Morling <gunnar(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
> Yes, probably we should not support Optional for fields. Also parameters are
> dubious (the JDK team discourages that afaik). But supporting it for return
> values (and getter-based properties) seems reasonable.
+1
Matt (with apologies for not having participated earlier in the spec
2.0 process)
>
> 2016-11-21 14:32 GMT+01:00 Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org>:
>>
>>
>> On 7 Nov 2016, at 23:42, Hendrik Ebbers <hendrik.ebbers(a)me.com> wrote:
>>
>> I don’t think that support for Optional is that important since having a
>> field of type Optional looks like an anti-pattern to me. Normally Optional
>> should be used as a method return type and not as a type for a field.
>> Supporting it in the bean validation might end in strange model classes.
>>
>> Example:
>>
>> The following model looks good to me:
>>
>> public class Model {
>>
>> @NotNull
>> private String name;
>>
>> public String getName() { return name; }
>>
>> public void setName(String name) { this.name = name; }
>>
>> public Optional<String> name() { return Optional.ofNullable(name);}
>>
>> }
>>
>> On the other hand this looks like an anti-pattern to me:
>>
>> public class Model {
>>
>> @NotNull
>> private Optional<String> name;
>>
>> public Optional<String> getName() { return name; }
>>
>> public void setName(String name) { this.name = Optional.ofNullable(name);
>> }
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>> Yes Optional on a property is deemed an anti pattern by the JDK team but
>> since Bean Validation supports contraints on method parameters and return
>> values, this is still a valid use case
>>
>> Optional<@Email String> getUserEmail(@NotNull UUID userId);
>>
>> Emmanuel
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
>> beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev