On 5 janv. 2012, at 21:53, Cemo wrote:
With my proposal you need to define A interfaces instead of AxMxN - A being the number of
separate phases in validation - and reuse the same set of interfaces for all your classes
and all your fields in a given project.
> @GroupSequence(value={Cheap.class,Expensive.class}, ordering=PER_TARGET)
> public class DomainObject {
>
> @Size(max=50, groups=Cheap.class) // constraint 1a
> @Pattern(regexp="[a-z]*", groups=Expensive.class) // constraint 1b
> private String name;
>
> @Size(max=20, groups=Cheap.class) // constraint 2a
> @URL(groups=Expensive.class) // constraint 2b
> private String email;
>
> @Size(max=100, groups=Cheap.class) // constraint 3a
> @Pattern(regexp="[0-9]*", groups=Expensive.class) // constraint 3b
> private String password;
> }
From my understanding, if there is violation at size constraint of name field, email or
passworld would not be validated? What I need is I want to validate all fields but for
each field I would like to raise at most one violation an ordered way. For example, first
size than pattern for name field.
No, no, in my proposal, @GroupSequence.ordering=PER_TARGET means that this group sequence
is applied per field and not globally. This is the behavior you are describing. For
example, BV could return the following failures:
- name: size beyond 50
- email: not a url
- password: too long