Re: [bv-dev] Validator#forMethods()
I like forMethods because it resonates faster on people's mind. But I
can live and get forExecutables grow on me. So I'm neutral.
Emmanuel
On Fri 2013-01-04 11:05, Gunnar Morling wrote:
Hi all,
While working on the TCK, I came across our new method
Validator#forMethods() which allows to validate method and constructor
parameters/return values.
Given that we introduced the term "executable" when referring to both
methods and constructors, I wondered whether the method should better be
named "forExecutables()".
Thoughts?
--Gunnar
_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev