Re: [bv-dev] TCK expects tolerance of mismatched constraint and constraint validator

Similarly, ZeroConstraintValidator is declared as targeting @Negative. On Mar 16, 2018 1:44 PM, "Matt Benson" <mbenson(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > On Mar 16, 2018 1:39 PM, "Matt Benson" <mbenson(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > > FrenchAddressListContainer defines @FrenchZipcodeListContainer as a > constraint that is validated by FrenchZipcodeConstraintValidator, but > that class declares its constraint type parameter as @FrenchZipCode. > > > Same for FrenchZipcodeMixDirectAnnotationAndListContainer. > > Because > > that CV type does not override #init() this presumably works in the RI, > and the spec is a bit vague on this point, but the interface definition > describes type parameter A as "the annotation type handled by an > implementation." The spec section ConstraintValidator resolution algorithm > also correlates constraint A to the type parameters of the > ConstraintValidators described in the resolution rules. Finally, I don't > see anything under "What's new in 2.0" to indicate that this should be a > legal constraint definition. > > Can I get a ruling? :) > > Matt > > > _______________________________________________ beanvalidation-dev mailing list beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev