Re: [bv-dev] Ordered Validation (practically)

On 5 janv. 2012, at 16:58, Matt Benson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org&gt; wrote: >> >> On 5 janv. 2012, at 13:44, Hardy Ferentschik wrote: >> >>>> >>>> Thanks for summing up. >>> >>> No problem. I will try to sum this up on beanvalidation.org asap as well. >> >> Thanks, say you sum up BV-220 and BV-259 and I will sum up the other subjects disccussed in the last few days. Lots of good content :) > > Guys, >  Just to inject a little insanity into the debate... we've touched on > the idea of obtaining information in unorthodox ways before (parameter > names come to mind).  Now, this proceeds from the assumption that a > given Java compiler would assemble bytecode such that visible > annotations would stay in the order in which they were defined, but > given that that is true for one or more available compilers, what is > the feeling of the community toward specifying that order be derived > from bytecode inspection?  I realize this is quite specific, but in > the end nothing is more intuitive than just using the annotations in > the order in which they are actually specified. An alternative is to use annotation processors to capture source time information via some kind of annotations but both approaches sound very scary. Matt do you think it's really worth exploring?

_______________________________________________ beanvalidation-dev mailing list beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev