Re: [bv-dev] Method validation - cont'd
Some of my preferences:
On May 9, 2012, at 10:24 PM, Gunnar Morling wrote:
* Align on approach for cross-parameter validation
I am still leaning towards #2 as described here -
http://beanvalidation.org/proposals/BVAL-241/#cross_parameter
Otherwise #3
* Should method validation methods be defined on j.v.Validator or a
dedicated new interface?
Should be on javax.validation.Validator
* Further discuss @MethodValidated annotation with other EGs (e.g.
JAX-RS)
What's about @ValidateContract, @ContractValidated or even just @Constract
This get the "design by contract" idea in as well and it avoids the ambiguity
when
it comes to constructors.
* Should ParameterNameProvider go into a sub-package?
which one do you have in mind there?
--Hardy