3:46 a.m.
a bv-implementation can use a default implementation (which isn't
configured -> it gets instantiated manually).
such a default implementation aggregates the configured versions.
e.g. if you have cdi + spring in the classpath, only one will return a
result. as soon as an implementation returns a result, the rest can be
skipped.
regards,
gerhard
2012/1/4 Michael Nascimento <misterm(a)gmail.com>
In most deployment scenarios, I wouldn't expect more than one to
be
available, so it should simply work. In case more than one is available, we
should probably fail with an exception.
Regards,
Michael
On 4 Jan 2012 07:16, "Emmanuel Bernard" <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
> I'm not sure I follow you exact proposal so let me rephrase and let me
> know if I am off track.
>
> You want we define a service loader
> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/ServiceLoader.html to
> retrieve the expected DI solution.
>
> My concern with that is that it's a static solution. What happens if two
> service providers corresponding to this service are present? Which one to
> chose and how is the user expected to chose one or the other?
> I feel like we should keep Bean Validation's configuration away from any
> "static" approach and let people configure two ValidatorFactory completely
> independently.
>
> On 3 janv. 2012, at 21:55, Gerhard Petracek wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> i was going to suggest something similar.
>
> we could provide a simple adapter interface with a method like:
> <T> T resolveBean(Class<T> targetType)
> (and if we would like to support dependent beans, we should think about
> an additional dispose method.)
>
> the only restriction is the manual usage of methods like
> ValidatorContext#messageInterpolator.
> however, since it would be possible to configure those parts via a
> dependency injection container like cdi, it isn't a big issue.
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2012/1/3 Michael Nascimento <misterm(a)gmail.com>
>
>> What about a different proposal: looking up the interface implementation
>> using ServiceLoader? Then there would be nothing special about it.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Michael
>> On 3 Jan 2012 17:25, "Emmanuel Bernard" <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org>
wrote:
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
>> beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev