I really see CDI as the major thing we should be concerned about, so
it being on the top of the list seems right.
Regards,
Michael
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Emmanuel Bernard
<emmanuel(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
I have written a blog entry our status update.
http://beanvalidation.org/news/2012/08/31/big-push-on-bean-validation/
Emmanuel
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:28:31PM +0200, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The details of the Java EE schedule is being fleshed out but regardless of the
outcome, the timing will be tight to get as much as possible and as good as possible in
Bean Validation 1.1. If there is a time to focus your effort on Bean Validation, this is
right now.
>
> My plan is to get a lot of high priority proposals started and discussed in september
so that we can refine them in october and start working on the implementation and TCK. I
also plan to use my spec lead hammer to unstuck discussions where we have been at a
stalemate.
>
> Hardy, Gunnar and I have refined the roadmap and priority list based on the recent
inputs. You can find it as usual on the website
http://beanvalidation.org/roadmap/.
Remember, if you want to contribute to the website, simply fork on GitHub and send a pull
request.
>
> If you feel that something is out of order in
http://beanvalidation.org/roadmap/#priorities speak up now. We will most likely address
them in the relevant order.
>
> Emmanuel
_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev