I have no idea what are u talking about.
I cannot see any PR which would still be "Open".
The one you linked was actually merged, what's wrong about that?
Matej
----- Original Message -----
From: "Werner Keil" <werner.keil(a)gmail.com>
To: "Martin Kouba" <mkouba(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "cdi-dev" <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 1:20:54 PM
Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] CDI spec github repo cleanup
Looks like those are mostly PRs you have to acknowledge before they go away
like
https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/349#event-893299947
Werner
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Martin Kouba < mkouba(a)redhat.com > wrote:
There are no GH issues in cdi-spec/cdi repository (CDI API + document).
cdi-spec/
cdi-spec.org contains the sources for the website.
Martin
Dne 25.1.2017 v 13:07 Werner Keil napsal(a):
Hi,
Speaking of GitHub, what are those GH issues that remain unsolved for a
very long time now? Are they for a next version or why did they sit
there for a few months now?
Werner
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code
under the Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html ). For all other ideas
provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
property rights inherent in such information.
--
Martin Kouba
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat, Czech Republic
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code
under the Apache License, Version 2
(
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
property rights inherent in such information.