So CDI is meanwhile an Ecipse project?
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Struberg [mailto:struberg@yahoo.de]
Sent: Freitag, 17. Mai 2019 13:29
To: Markus KARG
Cc: Scott Stark; cdi-dev
Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] Project renaming
+1, the legal conept is called 'nominative use' of a mark.
Otoh I like the rename for consistency reasons with other EE specs and to
make it clear that we switched packages.
LieGrue,
strub
Am 17.05.2019 um 09:03 schrieb Markus KARG
<markus(a)headcrashing.eu>:
There is no such risk, as Oracle officially allows everybody explicitly to
use the
suffix "for Java". You only need to rename in case the word Java is
used without "for".
-Markus
From: cdi-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:cdi-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On
Behalf Of Scott Stark
Sent: Freitag, 17. Mai 2019 04:29
To: cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: [cdi-dev] Project renaming
One thing that needs to happen for each Jakarta EE project is a renaming
to avoid
the Oracle trademarked names and acronyms. The means that Contexts
and Dependency Injection for Java needs to change to avoid the use of Java.
The current proposed name from the steering committee is Jakarta Contexts
and Dependency Injection.
The projects should have been asked by the PMC what their preferred rename
is, but
I have not seen anything back from the CDI dev group. I had asked
this question a while back but it appears to be have bounced due to not
being subscribed, so I wanted to raise this question again.
Are there other preferences this project would like the steering and
specification
committees to entertain?
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
code under
the Apache License, Version 2
(
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
property rights inherent in such information.