Re: [cdi-dev] Adding CDI-129 to MR proposed list ?
No, it was just a joke, really!
You have been asking if someone has a small topic for the remaining 4 minutes. And I just
said that we could try and solve CDI-129 then ;)
CDI-129 would first need JavaEE8 to properly define the ClassLoader hierarchy. Before this
is fixed we cannot do much in that regard.
LieGrue,
strub
----- Original Message -----
From: Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net>
To: cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, 26 November 2013, 3:56
Subject: [cdi-dev] Adding CDI-129 to MR proposed list ?
Someone yesterday mentioned CDI 129 (Clarify behaviour of @ApplicationScoped in
EARs) [1] at the end of the meeting.
I didn’t add it to the MR in the 1st place because it seemed a too big issue for
a MR, yet it is a popular one.
Do you think it’s realistic to add and discuss this issue ?
[1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-129
Antoine
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev