7:08 a.m.
btw, can the mailing daemon be configured to automatically contain the list as mail-to?
:)
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Wed, 4/27/11, Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de> wrote:
From: Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de>
Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] CDI 1.1
To: "Peter Muir" <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011, 12:06 PM
is fine with me.
I just found it a good idea to encourage people to use the
voting feature of jira. People are not using it often since
it is most times ignored. If the votes actually have a real
impact, then people will use it more often - which would in
turn provide a good feedback for the EG.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Wed, 4/27/11, Peter Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> From: Peter Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] CDI 1.1
> To: "Mark Struberg" <struberg(a)yahoo.de>
> Cc: "cdi-dev" <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011, 12:01 PM
> I see. We can consider doing
> something like this - I guess what I have asked people
to do
> initially is equivalent to the feasibility check. We
can
> open it up to the community for after the kick off con
call
> and get their feedback on whether we are going in the
right
> direction. How does that sound?
>
> On 27 Apr 2011, at 12:57, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
> > The EG and extended EG first worked through all
the
> Jira issues and did some documentation and
feasibility
> checks. Before finishing the spec he called for
feedback in
> the community basically asking them to vote for the
jira
> issues (directly in jira) they see as most important
to get
> fixed.
> >
> >
> >
http://weblogs.java.net/blog/edburns/archive/2011/04/25/vote-your-top-fiv...
> >
> > http://java.net/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?requestId=10523
> >
> > Actually your own uidata issue comes out on top
;)
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> > --- On Wed, 4/27/11, Peter Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Peter Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] CDI 1.1
> >> To: "Mark Struberg" <struberg(a)yahoo.de>
> >> Cc: "cdi-dev" <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> >> Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011, 11:49 AM
> >> Can you briefly explain the system he
> >> used?
> >>
> >> On 27 Apr 2011, at 12:47, Mark Struberg
wrote:
> >>
> >>> Congratulations Pete!
> >>>
> >>> What do you think about a public voting
as Ed
> did with
> >> JSF-2.2?
> >>> Could give some good feedback.
> >>>
> >>> LieGrue,
> >>> strub
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --- On Wed, 4/27/11, Peter Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> From: Peter Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
> >>>> Subject: [cdi-dev] CDI 1.1
> >>>> To: "cdi-dev" <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> >>>> Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011,
11:25 AM
> >>>> Hi everyone
> >>>>
> >>>> Welcome to the CDI 1.1 expert group.
I've
> started
> >> to
> >>>> collect some resources at https://github.com/pmuir/cdi/wiki. Please
take some
> >>>> time to read through them.
> >>>>
> >>>> I would like everyone to work their
way
> through
> >> the various
> >>>> lists of issues in JIRA
https://github.com/pmuir/cdi/wiki/CDI-1.1-issues and
> >> do
> >>>> four things:
> >>>>
> >>>> * If you are aware of an issue that
is
> not
> >> recorded, please
> >>>> create one
> >>>> * If you think an issue on the TBC
list
> should be
> >> addressed
> >>>> in CDI 1.1 then please make a note
of
> this, and
> >> prepare an
> >>>> email to this list explaining why
you
> think the
> >> issue should
> >>>> be included. Please restrict yourself
to
> three
> >> such issues.
> >>>> * If you think an issue on the
proposed
> list
> >> shouldn't be
> >>>> addressed then please make a note of
this,
> and
> >> prepare an
> >>>> email to this list explaining why
you
> think the
> >> issue
> >>>> shouldn't be included. Please
restrict
> yourself to
> >> three
> >>>> such issues.
> >>>> * Write a note to the list indicating
what
> issues
> >> you are
> >>>> going to take a lead on. For major
issues,
> prepare
> >> a 2
> >>>> minute summary for the concall so
that you
> can
> >> brief people
> >>>> on the issue.
> >>>>
> >>>> The (soft) deadline for this exercise
is
> Wednesday
> >> 11th
> >>>> May. Of course, we can continue to
debate
> the
> >> merits of
> >>>> issues after this, but to make things
run
> smoothly
> >> it will
> >>>> help a lot if we can get this done
> quickly!
> >>>>
> >>>> I propose we have conference call on
> Thursday 12th
> >> May to
> >>>> kick off, overview the main issues
facing
> us and
> >> run through
> >>>> who will take what issues. Here is
my
> proposed
> >> slot -
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=CDI+Kick+off+con...
> >>>> - it's difficult to find something
> suitable for
> >> everyone,
> >>>> but this does allow both people in
> Australia (late
> >> night)
> >>>> and the US West Coast (our two
extremes)
> to
> >> particpate.
> >>>>
> >>>> Any comments or suggestions welcome,
> >>>>
> >>>> Pete
> >>>>
> _______________________________________________
> >>>> cdi-dev mailing list
> >>>> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
>
>