Candi implements CDI 1.0 and never provided solution for java SE. To my
knowledge that don't have plan for CDI 1.2 or 2.0.
Antoine
Le sam. 4 juil. 2015 à 14:02, arjan tijms <arjan.tijms(a)gmail.com> a écrit :
Hi,
I've got one comment:
>Since the beginning both implementations (JBoss Weld and Apache
OpenWebBeans) proposed proprietary solutions to use CDI in Java SE.
Aren't there 3 implementations really? CanDI implements CDI too, doesn't
it?
Kind regards,
Arjan Tijms
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Antoine Sabot-Durand
<antoine(a)sabot-durand.net> wrote:
> Of course it's CDI 2.0 EDR1 ;). <bad faith>it was a test to see if
someone
> was actually reading </bad faith>
>
> Antoine
>
> Le 3 juil. 2015 à 15:41, John D. Ament <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com> a écrit
:
>
> Very nice! (though the email subject is a little misleading)
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 9:12 AM Antoine Sabot-Durand
> <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>>
>> You can communicate on it or give me your feedback on the post
>>
>>
http://cdi-spec.org/news/2015/07/03/CDI-2_0-EDR1-released/
>>
>> Antoine
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdi-dev mailing list
>> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>
>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
>> code under the Apache License, Version 2
>> (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
>> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
intellectual
>> property rights inherent in such information.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
code
> under the Apache License, Version 2
> (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
intellectual
> property rights inherent in such information.