[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy...
]
Matej Novotny commented on CDI-420:
-----------------------------------
I agree with adding either a tag or an attribute. It is IMHO not worth a whole new mode as
it is pretty much similar to "annotated" one.
Which leads me to a question. [~struberg] did you really mean to add a sample with
{{<beans bean-discovery-mode="all"}}? I agree with Martin that it would fit
better to the {{annotated}} type.
add a bean-discovery-mode 'scoped'
----------------------------------
Key: CDI-420
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-420
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Packaging and Deployment
Affects Versions: TBD
Reporter: Mark Struberg
Fix For: 2.0 (discussion)
This is for some future CDI release.
We currently only have 3 bean-discovery-modes
* none
* all
* annotated
The spec also currently says that ProcessAnnotatedType will only get fired (12.4) for
• each Java class, interface or enum deployed in an explicit bean archive, and
• each Java class with a bean defining annotation in an implicit bean archive.
• each session bean
Which means that we do not get the ProcessAnnotatedType (PAT) event for any class in an
'annotated' or 'implicit' BDA which does _not_ have a bean defining
annotation.
It might be useful to fire the ProcessAnnotatedType for all classes, but do not pick them
up as Beans if they (after PAT) do not have a valid scope. Effectively doing the
processing but not make them @Dependent automatically if there is no scope annotation at
the end of the PAT processing.
I'm not yet 100% sure how important this distinction is in practice. Just writing
this up to not forget about the idea...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)