]
Antoine Sabot-Durand updated CDI-441:
-------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 2.0-EDR2
Enhance wording for indirect specialization in 4.3.1
----------------------------------------------------
Key: CDI-441
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-441
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Clarification
Components: Inheritance and Specialization
Affects Versions: 1.2.Final
Reporter: Tomas Remes
Fix For: 2.0-EDR2
In the 4.3.1. Direct and indirect specialization is following:
{quote}
Formally, a bean X is said to specialize another bean Y if either:
• X directly specializes Y, or
• a bean Z exists, such that X directly specializes Z and Z specializes Y.
{quote}
It is not fully straightforward to deduce that the second point here is not just
redundant first case, but rather transitive relationship in indirect specialization.
Therefore I think the wording for indirect specialization should be enhanced. Explanation
from Jozef is at
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/2014-June/005082.html.