April 2011 - cdi-dev - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (CDI-123) Using Seam XML extension for CDI and Candi XML as a guide, let's add the ability to do XML config back into the specification

by Richard Hightower (JIRA)

Using Seam XML extension for CDI and Candi XML as a guide, let's add the ability to do XML config back into the specification ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: CDI-123 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-123 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Feature Request Components: Concepts Affects Versions: 1.1 (Proposed) Reporter: Richard Hightower Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) Using Seam's CDI XML extension for CDI and Candi XML as a guide, let's add the ability to do XML config back into the specification. Annotations and Alternatives should always be the first line of offense for doing injection, decoration and interception. However, there are times when you want to configure things that don't fit well into this model. This is also useful for testing. This is not to give up type safeness via annotations, but to have some additional flexibility. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 2 months

8
12
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (CDI-120) Add an optional Portlet specification support

by Mark Struberg (JIRA)

Add an optional Portlet specification support --------------------------------------------- Key: CDI-120 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-120 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Feature Request Components: Contexts Reporter: Mark Struberg We should mention the portlet specification and how CDI-1.1 should be utilised/supported in a portlet environment. This is an important prerequisite for the JSR-344 EG to deprecate the JSF @javax.faces.bean.ManagedBean capabilities. Imo there is currently no argument which prevents to run a CDI container from running in a portlet environment anyway. No CDI interface imports any javax.servlet.* class. It could affect the wording in 6.5.2. which defines the built in scopes as being 'as defined in the Servlet specification'. We could easily extend this to also cover the portlet definition. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 2 months

3
8
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (CDI-110) Allow proxying of abstract classes (Service Handler)

by George Gastaldi (JIRA)

Allow proxying of abstract classes (Service Handler) ---------------------------------------------------- Key: CDI-110 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-110 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Feature Request Components: Inheritance and Specialization Affects Versions: 1.1 (Proposed) Reporter: George Gastaldi According to mojavelinux: {quote} <mojavelinux> service handler, interceptors and decorators are all complementary <mojavelinux> and cdi is missing the first...which we now realize {quote} CDI 1.1 should provide a way to inject abstract classes by specifying a ServiceHandler (Check http://docs.jboss.org/seam/3/solder/latest/reference/en-US/html/serviceha...) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 3 months

10
34
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (CDI-103) Support client controlled contexts

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

Support client controlled contexts ---------------------------------- Key: CDI-103 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-103 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Feature Request Reporter: Pete Muir In a client controlled context, the client controls via some identifier (probably an identifier, but we should allow the context to inspect the injection point) which contextual instances it sees for a particular bean type. For example given: {code} @MyScope class Foo { String name; } {code} and a context which uses annotations to differentiate between contextual instance, these two injection points would see different instances: {code} @Inject @Bar Foo barFoo; @Inject @Baz Foo bazFoo; {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 3 months

1
4
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (CDI-109) Invalid beans should not be injectable into extensions

by John Ament (JIRA)

Invalid beans should not be injectable into extensions ------------------------------------------------------ Key: CDI-109 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-109 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Feature Request Reporter: John Ament Currently, you can inject beans that may not be ready yet into the extension's call back methods. As an example, I can inject something application scoped like this in to an extension, but it should really be throwing a definition exception (or similar): public void handleABD(@Observes AfterBeanDiscovery abd, MyApplicationScopedBean masb) { } Pete had noted that really the only safe thing to inject, other than the observed call back, is the bean manager. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 4 months

10
18
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (CDI-112) Clarify how alternatives are enabled

by Shane Bryzak (JIRA)

Clarify how alternatives are enabled ------------------------------------ Key: CDI-112 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-112 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Clarification Components: Beans Affects Versions: 1.0 Reporter: Shane Bryzak The spec is open to interpretation about how alternatives are enabled. One popular interpretation is that alternatives must be enabled within the same bean archive that contains the alternative bean. However, it might be worth considering the merit of enabling an alternative from a deployment archive that contains the bean archive. For example, suppose we have the following deployment archive: foo.war /WEB-INF beans.xml /lib bar.jar /META-INF beans.xml /com /acme AlternativeBean.class It may be worth allowing AlternativeBean.class (a class annotated with @Alternative) to be enabled by listing it in the <alternatives> section of foo.war/WEB-INF/beans.xml. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 4 months

4
8
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (CDI-121) TransactionScope

by Richard Hightower (JIRA)

TransactionScope ---------------- Key: CDI-121 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-121 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Feature Request Components: Contexts Affects Versions: 1.1 (Proposed) Environment: Java EE Reporter: Richard Hightower Priority: Minor Add TransctionalScope as a standard scope to define beans whose lifecycle is the same as a given transaction. This scope should start automatically when a transaction starts (but lazily when actually needed). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 4 months

14
47
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (CDI-114) Allow registration of beans at runtime

by Vincent Massol (JIRA)

Allow registration of beans at runtime -------------------------------------- Key: CDI-114 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-114 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Feature Request Components: Beans Affects Versions: 1.0 Reporter: Vincent Massol I have use cases where I need to register a bean dynamically at runtime (see the forum reference link for a detailed description of the use case). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 1 month

8
13
0 / 0

calling 'equals' on a proxy?

by Mark Struberg

Hi Pete, others! Do you remember our discussion about what should happen if equals() gets called on a proxy? Should it route to the equals method of the currently proxied instance? LieGrue, strub

13 years, 2 months

7
18
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (CDI-118) Standardize deployment-related exception classes

by Dan Allen (JIRA)

Standardize deployment-related exception classes ------------------------------------------------ Key: CDI-118 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-118 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Feature Request Components: Packaging and Deployment Affects Versions: 1.0 Reporter: Dan Allen Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) While it's true that deployment exceptions are not a public API when developing with the CDI programming model, they are a public API for tools and in testing environments. It would be useful to standardize the deployment-related error and exception classes so that these tools don't have to rely on classes from the implementation. One example occurs in the CDI-TCK and it's counterpart, Arquillian. A test may want to verify that the code will result in a deployment error. Currently, to detect this exception, it's necessary to rely on an implementation specific exception class, which makes the test non-portable. Another example is a tool that starts a CDI runtime or server that provides CDI. The tool has to check for the implementation-specific exception to know if the deployment error is caused by CDI (and to capture and report that error). It important both when CDI is used for standalone bootstrap and for a container that provides CDI. Proposed APIs: javax.enterprise.inject.DeploymentException extends RuntimeException -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 3 months

6
8
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

cdi-dev April 2011