May 2012 - cdi-dev - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-201) Reflect BeanAttributes within validation rules

by Jozef Hartinger (Created) (JIRA)

Reflect BeanAttributes within validation rules ---------------------------------------------- Key: CDI-201 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-201 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Clarification Components: Portable Extensions Affects Versions: 1.1.EDR1 Reporter: Jozef Hartinger Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) For example: 1) The spec says: {quote}Each child <class> element must specify the name of an alternative bean class. If there is no class with the specified name, or *if the class with the specified name is not an alternative bean class, the container automatically detects the problem and treats it as a deployment problem*. {quote} Since that "alternative" attribute of a bean can be altered by a portable extension in the ProcessBeanAttributes phase, the specification should instead require for each class listed in the <class> element, each bean that defines the class as its bean class is an alternative. 2) {quote}If Y has a name and X declares a name explicitly, using @Named, the container automatically detects the problem and treats it as a definition error.{quote} The specification should abstract from @Named, since the ProcessBeanAttributes enables an extension to set a bean name without using @Named Likely, there are other similar issues. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 7 months

2
3
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-197) Clarify the order of container lifecycle events

by Jozef Hartinger (Created) (JIRA)

Clarify the order of container lifecycle events ----------------------------------------------- Key: CDI-197 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-197 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Clarification Components: Portable Extensions Affects Versions: 1.1.EDR1 Reporter: Jozef Hartinger Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) The order in which the following event types are fired is not clear from the spec: * ProcessModule * ProcessBeanAttributes * ProcessInjectionTarget -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 7 months

4
9
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (CDI-165) Support lifecycle events for non-builtin contexts

by Jozef Hartinger (JIRA)

Support lifecycle events for non-builtin contexts ------------------------------------------------- Key: CDI-165 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-165 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Feature Request Components: Contexts Affects Versions: 1.0 Reporter: Jozef Hartinger Priority: Minor Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) The original idea was to extend the API for context implementations to be able to notify the container of a context initialization / destruction. Based on this notification, the container would then notify the application by firing @Initialized(X) / @Destroyed(X) Object (where X is the scope annotation of the context - see CDI-86). I don't think this double-notification approach is a good idea anymore. Instead, the specification should simply mention that the extensions providing an implementation of Context are encouraged to fire a @Initialized(X) event when the context is initialized and @Destroyed(X) event when the context is destroyed (again, see CDI-86 for details). Extensions are free to choose a payload that makes most sense for the given context (e.g. UIViewRoot instance for @ViewScoped) or Object otherwise. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 7 months

2
4
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-184) Make sure that CDI.current() works in a modular environment

by Emmanuel Bernard (Created) (JIRA)

Make sure that CDI.current() works in a modular environment ----------------------------------------------------------- Key: CDI-184 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-184 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Feature Request Reporter: Emmanuel Bernard Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) OSGi containers and other modular environments tend to hide service files and consider them implementation details. That means that a naive current classloader based implementation won't discover the various CDI implementations. There are several approaches to try and work around this problem in EE specs h4. JPA 2's approach JPA 2 does have a static getter / setter pair {code}PersistenceProviderResolverHolder.getPersistenceProviderResolver() PersistenceProviderResolverHolder.setPersistenceProviderResolver(){code} which holds the resolver to use. A modular environment is free to override the default resolver. h4. Bean Validation's approach Bean Validation uses a different approach to work around the nasty static field. {code} Validation .byDefaultProvider() .providerResolver( myOSGiResolver ) .configure() //we have ways to customize the ValidatorFactory further .buildValidatorFactory(); {code} Note that Bean VAlidation approach has another benefit, you can physically ask for a specific Bean Validation provider implementation {code} Validation .byProvider( HibernateValidator.class ) .configure() .ignoreXmlConfiguration() //bean validation configuration .failSafe() //Hibernate specific configuration (type safe) .buildValidatorFactory(); {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 7 months

4
7
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-235) Clarify which scopes are active during @PostConstruct of remote EJBs and @Startup

by Joe Bergmark (JIRA)

Joe Bergmark created CDI-235: -------------------------------- Summary: Clarify which scopes are active during @PostConstruct of remote EJBs and @Startup Key: CDI-235 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-235 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Clarification Components: Contexts Affects Versions: 1.0 Reporter: Joe Bergmark Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) There is a very similar snippet regarding when scopes are active for all EJBs in 6.7.1 and 6.7.3. Neither appears to directly address @PostConstruct, though 6.7.3 does address @PreDestroy. It makes sense to me that application scope would be active during @PostConstruct, but that request scope might not be as @PostConstruct might be called outside of a business method invocation. I believe 7.2 states that lifecycle callbacks are not business method invocations. This is a slightly more generic version of CDI-219, which specifically addresses request scope in EJB @Singleton @Startup @PostConstruct methods. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 7 months

2
3
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-230) Clarify that some Scope constellations for producer fields result in non portable behaviour

by Mark Struberg (JIRA)

Mark Struberg created CDI-230: --------------------------------- Summary: Clarify that some Scope constellations for producer fields result in non portable behaviour Key: CDI-230 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-230 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Clarification Components: Beans Affects Versions: 1.1.EDR1 Reporter: Mark Struberg Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) We should add something like the following to the producer-field paragraph: "When a producer field produces a bean with a 'shorter' Lifecycle than the scope of the class the producer field is defined in, non-portable behaviour results." An example: {code} @ApplicationScoped public class ContainerBean { @Produces @RequestScoped Something something = new Something(1, 2, 3); void throwAway(@Disposes Something sthg) { sthg.destroyMe(); } } {code} The problem is that each request will take 'something' from the @ApplicationScoped ContainerBean. Thus all requests share the same contextual instance! Afer the first request ends, the disposal method 'throwAway' will destroy the information inside the variable 'something' and leaves it in a broken state for all other requests -> bang... -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 7 months

2
4
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-195) Clarify serializability requirements for extension-provided metadata

by Jozef Hartinger (Created) (JIRA)

Clarify serializability requirements for extension-provided metadata -------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: CDI-195 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-195 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Feature Request Components: Portable Extensions Affects Versions: 1.0 Reporter: Jozef Hartinger Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) The spec never requires an extension-provided implementation of the Bean, Interceptor, Decorator or InjectionPoint to be serializable. The implementation indicates, whether the underlying bean is passivation capable by implementing PassivationCapable, but the implementation itself does not have to be serializable. For both the InjectionPoint bean and Bean metadata bean the spec says: "The built-in implementation must be a passivation capable dependency". However, this is hard to guarantee if an extension provides a non-serializable implementation of a Bean/InjectionPoint interface, e.g. the following code would cause problems at passivation: public class Bar implements Serializable { @Inject private InjectionPoint ip; } If the metadata of the Bar bean (Bean<Bar>) is not serializable, Bar cannot be passivated. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 8 months

7
9
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-172) Constructor injection of Java EE components

by Pete Muir (Created) (JIRA)

Constructor injection of Java EE components ------------------------------------------- Key: CDI-172 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-172 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Feature Request Affects Versions: 1.0 Reporter: David Blevins Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) Ctor injection of e.g. servlets -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 8 months

2
1
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-175) Support for UEL pluggable type converters

by Pete Muir (Created) (JIRA)

Support for UEL pluggable type converters ----------------------------------------- Key: CDI-175 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-175 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Feature Request Affects Versions: 1.0 Reporter: Pete Muir Priority: Optional Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 8 months

2
1
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (CDI-144) Support Injection into Entity Listeners

by Cody Lerum (JIRA)

Support Injection into Entity Listeners --------------------------------------- Key: CDI-144 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-144 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Feature Request Reporter: Cody Lerum It would be very convenient if CDI was available inside JPA Entity Listeners. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 8 months

6
15
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

cdi-dev May 2012