January 2013 - cdi-dev - Jboss List Archives

Fwd: Interceptors spec 1.2 draft is available for review

by Pete Muir

FYI - big improvements to the interceptors spec - much better for alignment with CDI. I'll update CDI, next, to take account of this. Begin forwarded message: > From: Marina Vatkina <marina.vatkina(a)oracle.com> > Subject: Interceptors spec 1.2 draft is available for review > Date: 29 January 2013 22:06:36 GMT > To: jsr345-experts(a)ejb-spec.java.net, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> > > After a lot of work by Linda, me, and Pete, we have the Interceptors spec 1.2 draft for review: http://java.net/projects/interceptors-spec/downloads/download/interceptor... > > What's there: > Editorial cleanup and conversion to standard template. > Assigned chapter numbers to sections and rearranged various sections and examples for better flow. > Clarified statement regarding transaction context of lifecycle callback methods > Added a note on a timeout method that is also a business method and around-timeout and around-invoke interceptors > Added Chapter 1 (Overview) > Added Chapter 3, derived from Chapter 9 of the CDI specification. > Removed deployment descriptors definitions (general notes about possibility of DDs are there) > Added examples with interceptor bindings to common sections. > Added standard Priority ranges > > What's not there: > @AroundConstruct interceptor > Notes on "throws Exception" clauses in the around-xxx method signatures > Perfect CDI alignment - the text (and fonts) might be not fully aligned. > > Please review ASAP. > > Pete, please forward to the CDI EG. > > thanks, > -marina

11 years, 11 months

2
1
0 / 0

Re: [cdi-dev] NullPointer Exception using @Inject

by Nivedita Prabhakar Dixit

Also PFA the exception details for reference Thanks, Nivedita From: Nivedita Prabhakar Dixit Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 12:42 PM To: 'cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org' Subject: NullPointer Exception using @Inject Hi All, I am getting Null pointer exception when I use @Inject annotation to inject a service class defined in jar into my façade defined war . I am using glassfish-4.0-b72 , primefaces 3.4 and JSF 2.2 defined in glassfish. Mojarra loads without any issues and so does primefaces. When I use @Inject the injected bean does not get instantiated . Please let me know if I am missing something I have beans.xml included in my .war and .jar as well. Thanks, Nivedita **************** CAUTION - Disclaimer ***************** This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are not to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other person and any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the Infosys e-mail system. ***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS***

11 years, 11 months

2
1
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-271) Provide a way to inject Event metadata into an observer method

by Arne Limburg (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Arne Limburg commented on CDI-271: ---------------------------------- Pull-request sent > Provide a way to inject Event metadata into an observer method > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-271 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-271 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Events > Reporter: Arne Limburg > Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) > > > Currently there is no way for observer methods to access the qualifiers of the fired event (i.e. to access @Nonbinding members). > Consider the following example: > {code} > @Inject @MyQualifier > Event<MyObject> event; > public void fireEvent(MyObject object, MyTypeValue type) { > event.select(new MyTypeAnnotationLiteral(type)).fire(object); > } > {code} > Currently no observer can receive the value of MyTypeValue. I suggest to introduce an interface AnnotatedEvent that extends Annotated and contains this information. It then could be injected via the InjectionPoint like this: > {code} > public void observeEvent(@Observes @MyType MyObject object, InjectionPoint ip) { > MyType annotation = ip.getAnnotated().getAnnotation(MyType.class); > MyTypeValue value = annotation.value(); > ... > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-298) @WithAnnotations needs to consider annotations on superclasses

by Jozef Hartinger (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Jozef Hartinger commented on CDI-298: ------------------------------------- {quote}Even if you change the AnnotatedType of a superclass via ProcessAnnotatedType, this does not change the AnnotatedType of any subclass!{quote} Definitely agreed, but this is unrelated to my previous comment. > @WithAnnotations needs to consider annotations on superclasses > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-298 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-298 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Pete Muir > Assignee: Pete Muir > Priority: Minor > Labels: with-annotations > Fix For: 1.1.PFD > > > The wording current prohibits this, it's a mistake in the wording. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-298) @WithAnnotations needs to consider annotations on superclasses

by Mark Struberg (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Mark Struberg commented on CDI-298: ----------------------------------- Even if you change the AnnotatedType of a superclass via ProcessAnnotatedType, this does *not* change the AnnotatedType of any subclass! Thus the behaviour is fine imo. > @WithAnnotations needs to consider annotations on superclasses > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-298 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-298 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Pete Muir > Assignee: Pete Muir > Priority: Minor > Labels: with-annotations > Fix For: 1.1.PFD > > > The wording current prohibits this, it's a mistake in the wording. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

NullPointer Exception using @Inject

by Nivedita Prabhakar Dixit

Hi All, I am getting Null pointer exception when I use @Inject annotation to inject a service class defined in jar into my façade defined war . I am using glassfish-4.0-b72 , primefaces 3.4 and JSF 2.2 defined in glassfish. Mojarra loads without any issues and so does primefaces. When I use @Inject the injected bean does not get instantiated . Please let me know if I am missing something I have beans.xml included in my .war and .jar as well. Thanks, Nivedita **************** CAUTION - Disclaimer ***************** This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are not to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other person and any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the Infosys e-mail system. ***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS***

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

Cancelled: CDI 1.1 weekly meeting

by pmuir＠redhat.com

A single instance of a recurring meeting has been cancelled. Subject: CDI 1.1 weekly meeting Organiser: Peter Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> Time: Monday, 28 January 2013, 17:00:00 GMT+00:00 - 19:00:00 GMT+00:00 Invitees: Mike Brock <cbrock(a)redhat.com>, Joseph Bergmark/Durham/IBM <bergmark(a)us.ibm.com>, "cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org" <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org> *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Fixing the time of the meeting post DST changes in UK/something going wrong with the invite! Weekly CDI 1.1 meeting http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converted.html?iso=20120803T15&p1=0... We will try to use Google Hangout, join #jsr346 10 minutes before the meeting to request an invite. Otherwise switch to the phone teleconference, see https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0ApqHbXzB1R1gdGRFWXB4TVpNeWFJ... for details.

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-298) @WithAnnotations needs to consider annotations on superclasses

by Jozef Hartinger (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Jozef Hartinger reopened CDI-298: --------------------------------- Reopening for the following issue to be considered. An AnnotatedType does not provide information about a superclass of the type. Instead, it provides a merged view of the type structure. As a result, some annotations defined on a superclass or its members may be accessed using the AnnotatedType (e.g. an annotation defined on a field of a superclass or a type-level annotation with @Inherited meta annotation) whereas others cannot (a type-level annotation without @Inherited). The first consequence is that a ProcessAnnotatedType event observer with @WithAnnotation(Foo.class) may be notified of an AnnotatedType even when the @Foo cannot be seen using AnnotatedType methods (e.g. Foo is a non-inherited annotation defined on a superclass of the type) The more serious consequence is related to synthetic annotated types. When an AnnotatedType is registered via BeforeBeanDiscovery.addAnnotatedType(), the CDI implementation only works with the merged view of the type hierarchy and cannot therefore examine the annotations on superclasses. Using reflection would be a mistake since the AnnotatedType overrides reflection metadata. Operating only on annotations available via AnnotatedType methods would create an inconsistency between how implicit and synthetic AnnotatedTypes are treated. I think the solution would be to redefine @WithAnnotations behavior to only match those annotations accessible via AnnotatedType methods. > @WithAnnotations needs to consider annotations on superclasses > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-298 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-298 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Pete Muir > Assignee: Pete Muir > Priority: Minor > Labels: with-annotations > Fix For: 1.1.PFD > > > The wording current prohibits this, it's a mistake in the wording. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-233) Specify target bean archive for bean added via AfterBeanDiscovery.addBean()

by Martin Kouba (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Martin Kouba commented on CDI-233: ---------------------------------- This applies to {{BeforeBeanDiscovery.addAnnotatedType()}} as well. > Specify target bean archive for bean added via AfterBeanDiscovery.addBean() > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-233 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-233 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Clarification > Components: Portable Extensions > Reporter: Martin Kouba > Labels: visibility > Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) > > > This may have impact, provided that alternatives, interceptors or decorators are used. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-319) @Vetoed placed on package should only affect beans

by Martin Kouba (JIRA)

Martin Kouba created CDI-319: -------------------------------- Summary: @Vetoed placed on package should only affect beans Key: CDI-319 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-319 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Clarification Reporter: Martin Kouba We should probably change the "3.12 Vetoing types" section title back to "Vetoing beans" and sync the spec wording with @Vetoed javadoc (which makes it clear). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

cdi-dev January 2013