February 2014 - cdi-dev - Jboss List Archives

by Antoine Sabot-Durand

Hi All, Just to inform you that I just merged PR 200, so spec files moved from ‘spec' to 'spec/src/main/doc’. Thanks to git it shouldn’t impact your work in progress on spec doc. Antoine

10 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-392) Clarify when the operations of BeanManager can be called

by Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Antoine Sabot-Durand commented on CDI-392: ------------------------------------------ [~bafco] In fact, the wording used by [~struberg] is a shortcut to mix the fact that either the container will throw an exception either it will provide non portable behavior depending on the impl... > Clarify when the operations of BeanManager can be called > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-392 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-392 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Clarification > Reporter: Matus Abaffy > Assignee: Mark Struberg > Labels: CDI_spec_chge, Ready_to_fix > Fix For: 1.2 Proposed > > > The current version of spec. states (under 11.3. The BeanManager object): "Any operation of BeanManager may be called at any time during the execution of the application." > This sentence is likely to be misinterpreted (see WELD-1453). Pointing out that BeanManager's methods can be called (without causing exception) just after AfterDeploymentValidation event is fired might be helpful. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

10 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-382) Clarify interceptors are not associated with the result of a producer method

by Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Antoine Sabot-Durand resolved CDI-382. -------------------------------------- Resolution: Done PR 206 integrated > Clarify interceptors are not associated with the result of a producer method > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-382 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-382 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Clarification > Components: Interceptors > Affects Versions: 1.1.PFD > Reporter: Martin Kouba > Assignee: Martin Kouba > Labels: CDI_spec_chge, Ready_to_fix > Fix For: 1.2 Proposed > > > The interceptors part from CDI-59 resolution [1] is missing in the final version of the spec, probably lost during the Interceptors section transfer to the Interceptors 1.2 spec. > [1] https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/110 > "Interceptors are not associated with the return value of a producer method or the current value of a producer field." -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

10 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-392) Clarify when the operations of BeanManager can be called

by Matus Abaffy (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Matus Abaffy commented on CDI-392: ---------------------------------- Maybe a magic formula "non-portable behavior results" would be more consistent with the spec. than "in order to prevent random behaviour" as it is used throughout the whole text. WDYT? Otherwise good for me as well. > Clarify when the operations of BeanManager can be called > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-392 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-392 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Clarification > Reporter: Matus Abaffy > Assignee: Mark Struberg > Labels: CDI_spec_chge, Ready_to_fix > Fix For: 1.2 Proposed > > > The current version of spec. states (under 11.3. The BeanManager object): "Any operation of BeanManager may be called at any time during the execution of the application." > This sentence is likely to be misinterpreted (see WELD-1453). Pointing out that BeanManager's methods can be called (without causing exception) just after AfterDeploymentValidation event is fired might be helpful. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

10 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-382) Clarify interceptors are not associated with the result of a producer method

by Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Antoine Sabot-Durand commented on CDI-382: ------------------------------------------ Thx. Yes the new workflow is only applied on "bug" and "feature request". I'm going to investigate why. > Clarify interceptors are not associated with the result of a producer method > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-382 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-382 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Clarification > Components: Interceptors > Affects Versions: 1.1.PFD > Reporter: Martin Kouba > Assignee: Martin Kouba > Labels: CDI_spec_chge, Ready_to_fix > Fix For: 1.2 Proposed > > > The interceptors part from CDI-59 resolution [1] is missing in the final version of the spec, probably lost during the Interceptors section transfer to the Interceptors 1.2 spec. > [1] https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/110 > "Interceptors are not associated with the return value of a producer method or the current value of a producer field." -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

10 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-382) Clarify interceptors are not associated with the result of a producer method

by Martin Kouba (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Martin Kouba commented on CDI-382: ---------------------------------- PR sent: https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/206 (I cannot figure how to use the new workflow for this issue) The final wording is a little bit modified so that all interceptor bindings are covered (those declared at class level, on stereotypes, etc.) > Clarify interceptors are not associated with the result of a producer method > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-382 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-382 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Clarification > Components: Interceptors > Affects Versions: 1.1.PFD > Reporter: Martin Kouba > Assignee: Martin Kouba > Labels: CDI_spec_chge, Ready_to_fix > Fix For: 1.2 Proposed > > > The interceptors part from CDI-59 resolution [1] is missing in the final version of the spec, probably lost during the Interceptors section transfer to the Interceptors 1.2 spec. > [1] https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/110 > "Interceptors are not associated with the return value of a producer method or the current value of a producer field." -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

10 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-382) Clarify interceptors are not associated with the result of a producer method

by Martin Kouba (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Work on CDI-382 stopped by Martin Kouba. > Clarify interceptors are not associated with the result of a producer method > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-382 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-382 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Clarification > Components: Interceptors > Affects Versions: 1.1.PFD > Reporter: Martin Kouba > Assignee: Martin Kouba > Labels: CDI_spec_chge, Ready_to_fix > Fix For: 1.2 Proposed > > > The interceptors part from CDI-59 resolution [1] is missing in the final version of the spec, probably lost during the Interceptors section transfer to the Interceptors 1.2 spec. > [1] https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/110 > "Interceptors are not associated with the return value of a producer method or the current value of a producer field." -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

10 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-382) Clarify interceptors are not associated with the result of a producer method

by Martin Kouba (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Martin Kouba updated CDI-382: ----------------------------- Summary: Clarify interceptors are not associated with the result of a producer method (was: Clarify interceptors are not associated with the result of a producer method/field) > Clarify interceptors are not associated with the result of a producer method > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-382 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-382 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Clarification > Components: Interceptors > Affects Versions: 1.1.PFD > Reporter: Martin Kouba > Assignee: Martin Kouba > Labels: CDI_spec_chge, Ready_to_fix > Fix For: 1.2 Proposed > > > The interceptors part from CDI-59 resolution [1] is missing in the final version of the spec, probably lost during the Interceptors section transfer to the Interceptors 1.2 spec. > [1] https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/110 > "Interceptors are not associated with the return value of a producer method or the current value of a producer field." -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

10 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-423) Typo in section 11.3.26

by John Ament (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] John Ament commented on CDI-423: -------------------------------- Pull Request: https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/205 > Typo in section 11.3.26 > ----------------------- > > Key: CDI-423 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-423 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: John Ament > Priority: Minor > > There is a typo in 11.3.26 > http://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/1.1/cdi-spec.html#bm_obtain_extension > The method BeanManager.getExtensions() returns the container’s instance of an Extension class > Should be: The method `BeanManager.getExtension(Class<? extends Extension> clazz)` > This matches API docs and the verbiage at the end of the spec. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

10 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-423) Typo in section 11.3.26

by John Ament (JIRA)

John Ament created CDI-423: ------------------------------ Summary: Typo in section 11.3.26 Key: CDI-423 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-423 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Bug Reporter: John Ament Priority: Minor There is a typo in 11.3.26 http://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/1.1/cdi-spec.html#bm_obtain_extension The method BeanManager.getExtensions() returns the container’s instance of an Extension class Should be: The method `BeanManager.getExtension(Class<? extends Extension> clazz)` This matches API docs and the verbiage at the end of the spec. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

10 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

cdi-dev February 2014