October 2016 - cdi-dev - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-224) Support Decoration of no interface beans

by Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Antoine Sabot-Durand updated CDI-224: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 2.0 (discussion) (was: 2.0 .Final) > Support Decoration of no interface beans > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-224 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-224 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Decorators > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Aslak Knutsen > Assignee: Antoine Sabot-Durand > Labels: F2F2016 > Fix For: 2.0 (discussion) > > > According to CDI 1.0 Spec: > "Decorators may be associated with any managed bean that is not itself an interceptor or decorator or with any EJB session bean." > "The set of decorated types of a decorator includes all bean types of the managed bean which are Java interfaces, except for java.io.Serializable. The decorator bean class and its superclasses are not decorated types of the decorator." > Both CDI and EJB support No interface beans, but for some reason Decorators only work on methods from a Interface. While Interceptors on the other hand work fine with Classes. > I can see no technical reason to why Decorators should only work on Interfaces since all Proxies etc should already be in place. > {code} > import javax.decorator.Decorator; > import javax.decorator.Delegate; > import javax.enterprise.inject.Any; > import javax.inject.Inject; > import junit.framework.Assert; > import org.jboss.arquillian.container.test.api.Deployment; > import org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian; > import org.jboss.shrinkwrap.api.ShrinkWrap; > import org.jboss.shrinkwrap.api.spec.WebArchive; > import org.jboss.shrinkwrap.impl.BeansXml; > import org.junit.Test; > import org.junit.runner.RunWith; > @RunWith(Arquillian.class) > public class DecoratesClassTestCase { > @Deployment > public static WebArchive create() { > return ShrinkWrap.create(WebArchive.class) > .addAsWebInfResource( > new BeansXml().decorators(BusinessDecorator.class), "beans.xml"); > } > > @Test > public void shouldBeAbleToDecorate(BusinessObject business) throws Exception { > Assert.assertEquals("Decorated Test", business.send("Test")); > } > > @Decorator > public static abstract class BusinessDecorator extends BusinessObject { > @Inject @Delegate @Any > private BusinessObject delegate; > > public String send(String msg) { > return "Decorated " + delegate.send(msg); > } > } > > public static class BusinessObject { > > public String send(String msg) { > return msg; > } > } > } > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-634) Clarify contextual reference validity to a bean with a normal scope in Java SE

by Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Antoine Sabot-Durand updated CDI-634: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 2.0 .Final > Clarify contextual reference validity to a bean with a normal scope in Java SE > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: CDI-634 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-634 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Clarification > Reporter: Martin Kouba > Fix For: 2.0 .Final > > > In Java SE, a user might be tempted to share a contextual reference for a normal scoped bean (client proxy) between multiple "deployments" of a single application, e.g.: > # start CDI container > # get a reference > # stop CDI container > # start CDI container again and try to use the stored reference. > I believe such a reference should not be valid after an application stopped (contexts are destroyed, etc.). Right now, it seems to be undefined. > See also WELD-2190. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-138) Allow an extension to register an interceptor bindings and qualifiers with an AnnotatedType

by Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Antoine Sabot-Durand closed CDI-138. ------------------------------------ > Allow an extension to register an interceptor bindings and qualifiers with an AnnotatedType > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-138 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-138 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Interceptors, Portable Extensions > Affects Versions: 1.0, 1.1.EDR > Reporter: Kevin Pollet > Assignee: Pete Muir > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.1.PRD > > > At BeforeBeanDiscovery phase an interceptor binding could be added with an {{AnnotatedType}} instead of annotation class. This could allow to add annotations to existing annotation attributes. > For example this case is needed for annotations {{@CacheResult}}, {{@CacheRemoveEntry}} and {{@CacheRemoveAll}} from JSR-107 which haven't annotation attributes annotated with {{@NonBinding}}. > The method signature could be: > * {{BeforeBeanDiscovery#addInterceptorBinding(AnnotatedType<?> annotatedType, Annotation... bindingTypeDef)}} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-138) Allow an extension to register an interceptor bindings and qualifiers with an AnnotatedType

by Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Antoine Sabot-Durand resolved CDI-138. -------------------------------------- Resolution: Done > Allow an extension to register an interceptor bindings and qualifiers with an AnnotatedType > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-138 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-138 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Interceptors, Portable Extensions > Affects Versions: 1.0, 1.1.EDR > Reporter: Kevin Pollet > Assignee: Pete Muir > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.1.PRD > > > At BeforeBeanDiscovery phase an interceptor binding could be added with an {{AnnotatedType}} instead of annotation class. This could allow to add annotations to existing annotation attributes. > For example this case is needed for annotations {{@CacheResult}}, {{@CacheRemoveEntry}} and {{@CacheRemoveAll}} from JSR-107 which haven't annotation attributes annotated with {{@NonBinding}}. > The method signature could be: > * {{BeforeBeanDiscovery#addInterceptorBinding(AnnotatedType<?> annotatedType, Annotation... bindingTypeDef)}} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-269) Fire ProcessAnnotatedType for annotations

by Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Antoine Sabot-Durand closed CDI-269. ------------------------------------ Resolution: Rejected > Fire ProcessAnnotatedType for annotations > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-269 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-269 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 1.1.EDR > Reporter: Pete Muir > Assignee: Pete Muir > Fix For: 1.1.PRD > > > If we fire a PAT event for annotations, the members can have @Nonbinding added -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-138) Allow an extension to register an interceptor bindings and qualifiers with an AnnotatedType

by Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Antoine Sabot-Durand reopened CDI-138: -------------------------------------- > Allow an extension to register an interceptor bindings and qualifiers with an AnnotatedType > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-138 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-138 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Interceptors, Portable Extensions > Affects Versions: 1.0, 1.1.EDR > Reporter: Kevin Pollet > Assignee: Pete Muir > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.1.PRD > > > At BeforeBeanDiscovery phase an interceptor binding could be added with an {{AnnotatedType}} instead of annotation class. This could allow to add annotations to existing annotation attributes. > For example this case is needed for annotations {{@CacheResult}}, {{@CacheRemoveEntry}} and {{@CacheRemoveAll}} from JSR-107 which haven't annotation attributes annotated with {{@NonBinding}}. > The method signature could be: > * {{BeforeBeanDiscovery#addInterceptorBinding(AnnotatedType<?> annotatedType, Annotation... bindingTypeDef)}} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-269) Fire ProcessAnnotatedType for annotations

by Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Antoine Sabot-Durand reopened CDI-269: -------------------------------------- > Fire ProcessAnnotatedType for annotations > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-269 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-269 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 1.1.EDR > Reporter: Pete Muir > Assignee: Pete Muir > Fix For: 1.1.PRD > > > If we fire a PAT event for annotations, the members can have @Nonbinding added -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-269) Fire ProcessAnnotatedType for annotations

by Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Antoine Sabot-Durand resolved CDI-269. -------------------------------------- Resolution: Done > Fire ProcessAnnotatedType for annotations > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-269 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-269 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 1.1.EDR > Reporter: Pete Muir > Assignee: Pete Muir > Fix For: 1.1.PRD > > > If we fire a PAT event for annotations, the members can have @Nonbinding added -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-269) Fire ProcessAnnotatedType for annotations

by Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Antoine Sabot-Durand reopened CDI-269: -------------------------------------- Bad resolution status since it was not rejected bud done > Fire ProcessAnnotatedType for annotations > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-269 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-269 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 1.1.EDR > Reporter: Pete Muir > Assignee: Pete Muir > Fix For: 1.1.PRD > > > If we fire a PAT event for annotations, the members can have @Nonbinding added -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-87) Declarative control over classes including in bean archive scanning

by Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-87?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sys... ] Antoine Sabot-Durand updated CDI-87: ------------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 1.1.Final (was: TBD) > Declarative control over classes including in bean archive scanning > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-87 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-87 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Packaging and Deployment > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Pete Muir > Assignee: Pete Muir > Fix For: 1.1.Final > > > Weld introduced a XML syntax for this -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

cdi-dev October 2016