Re: [cdi-dev] Fwd: bean archives

Yes, chapter 5 is a bit confusing when it comes to composite Java EE modules. Comments inline: On 05/03/2015 12:20 AM, Emily Jiang wrote: The TCK for CDI 1.0, 1,1 and 1.2 expect Chapter 12 to be implemented. Therefore, implementing bean archive as defined in Chapter 12 is the right approach for a Weld integrator. > > I am guessing CDI 1.1/1.2 cts, the updated version of CDI 1.0(?), is > based on section 5. Can someone confirm? The spec needs to be updated > to remove the conflict between section 5 and section 12. > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: *Emily Jiang* <emijiang6(a)googlemail.com > <mailto:emijiang6@googlemail.com>> > Date: Sat, May 2, 2015 at 10:21 PM > Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] bean archives > To: Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de <mailto:struberg@yahoo.de>> > > > > I am guessing CDI 1.1/1.2 cts, the updated version of CDI 1.0(?), is > based on section 5. Can someone confirm? The spec needs to be updated > to remove the conflict between section 5 and section 12. > > On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de > <mailto:struberg@yahoo.de>> wrote: > > Actually the rules are still not clear. Section 5 and 12 > contradict each other. The EE6 RI, JBossAS6 and TomEE and WAS did > behave like in section 5 (1 BDA per ee-module) whereas Weld-2 > behaves like in section 12. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > On Saturday, 2 May 2015, 10:13, Antoine Sabot-Durand > <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net <mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net>> wrote: > > > > Hi Emily, > > The rules) apply to each jar (archive). There is no merging, > thus an app can contain three types of archives : > Non bean archives, > Implicit bean archives, > Explicit bean archives. > > Antoine Sabot-Durand > > > Le 1 mai 2015 à 23:03, Emily Jiang <emijiang6(a)googlemail.com > <mailto:emijiang6@googlemail.com>> a écrit : > >> >> I have a question on bean archives. >> >> For the jars under web-inf\lib, are they individual bean >> archives or they should be merged with web-inf\classes files >> and use the beans.xml under web-inf\ to form one bean archive? >> >> >> If they are merged together to form one bean archive, what >> will happen if they have their own beans.xml under Meta-inf dir? >> >> Below is the what spec says, but it does not mention the jar >> under web-inf\lib. The spec should make this situation clear. >> >> In the CDI1.2 spec: >> When determining which archives are bean archives, the >> container must consider: >> • Library jars, EJB jars or application client jars >> • The WEB-INF/classes directory of a war >> • Directories in the JVM classpath >> The container is not required to support application client >> jar bean archives. >> A Java EE container is required by the Java EE specification >> to support Java EE modules. Other >> containers may or may not provide support for war, EJB jar or >> rar bean archives. >> The beans.xml file must be named: >> • META-INF/beans.xml , or, >> • in a war, WEB-INF/beans.xml or >> WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/beans.xml. >> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks >> Emily >> ================= >> Emily Jiang >> ejiang(a)apache.org <mailto:ejiang@apache.org> >> _______________________________________________ >> cdi-dev mailing list >> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev >> >> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider >> licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 >> (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all >> other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all >> patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in >> such information. > > _______________________________________________ > cdi-dev mailing list > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev > > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider > licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 > (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all > other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all > patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such > information. > > > > > > -- > Thanks > Emily > ================= > Emily Jiang > ejiang(a)apache.org <mailto:ejiang@apache.org> > > > > -- > Thanks > Emily > ================= > Emily Jiang > ejiang(a)apache.org <mailto:ejiang@apache.org> > > > _______________________________________________ > cdi-dev mailing list > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev > > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.