Antoine,
I added a bunch of "suggestions" to the proposal. It generally looks
good and there's some minor things to refine.
It looks like I might qualify, if this list does not lie [1]. So, if
you'd have me, I'd be interested in joining the EG.
John
[1]:
https://jcp.org/ja/participation/members/A
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Antoine Sabot-Durand
<antoine(a)sabot-durand.net> wrote:
Hi all,
Pete and I just finished the draft of CDI 2.0 JSR proposal. It’s there :
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1al1rdAs3CN34a9zTe3cXsLL4LBfHhzP8EbuDJ...
The proposal now needs supporter to be ready for submission, so if you or your company is
member of the JCP or play a visible role in Java community and willing to support
officially this JSR, please let us know.
The document is open for comments but please use this only if you have an important point
that couldn’t be discussed after JSR launch.
Don’t forget to check the companion doc of this JSR regarding introduction of « parts »
in CDI :
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jzCuFQjtCSrnZGRAHjn0oknWvEaP3h0KizW1m...
The information in the document is not part of the JSR proposal, just a first idea of
what parts could be. The only thing that we’d want to make official in the JSR proposal is
this concept of parts. Their granularity, number or included features will be discussed
by the futur EG.
Thank you for your commitment and feedback,
Antoine
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev